makingmusic476 said: LordTheNightKnight said: makingmusic476 said: LordTheNightKnight said: makingmusic476 said: Michael Bay's thoughts on the format war (from Michael Bay's forum):
What you don't understand is corporate politics. Microsoft wants both formats to fail so they can be heroes and make the world move to digital downloads. That is the dirty secret no one is talking about. That is why Microsoft is handing out $100 million dollar checks to studios just embrace the HD DVD and not the leading, and superior Blu Ray. They want confusion in the market until they perfect the digital downloads. Time will tell and you will see the truth.
Michael Bay, Steven Spielberg, and Ridley Scott have all been very pro-Blu-Ray from the start. It's most likely because, as Directors, they feel that the added capacity and higher bitrates of Blu-Ray will lead to a better representation of their films. |
So it will be really interesting to see if the 3 layer HD-DVD changes this, assuming your guess is correct. |
That doesn't solve the bitrate limitation. |
Yes it does. Blu-ray's higher bitrates come from the higher capacity. |
Indirectly it does, because of the way data is stored from the disc. However, the 51gb HD DVD disc simply adds another layer to increase storage. The method of storing the data has not changed. Does a dual-layered HD DVD have a higher bitrate than a single-layered HD DVD? No. |
It's not about method. It's about FILE SIZE. Same capacity, equals same file size, equals same bitrate. Duh.
Okay, loading speed also matters, but that's moot since HD-DVD and blu-ray have 36mbs loading at 1x speed, and the best bitrate, that still allows more than two hours of 1080p video within 50GB, is just 24mbs (what blu-ray is running right now).