By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Square-Enix using Nintendo to pay for Final Fantasy 13 etc?

Ajax on 13 July 2008

I never talk about GR, and this guys just makes up out of nothing ''You use GR a lot, so I'll use it against you too.'' What the hell? You gotta have mixed me up with someone else dude. lol



''Hadouken!''

Around the Network
Bingoo on 13 July 2008
Kasz216 said:
Bingoo said:
Kasz216 said:
Ajax said:
Kasz216 said:

The Final Fnatasy Tactics Advance games are better then the original Final Fantasy tactics.

lol, this must the most funny comment of the month.

Laugh all you want, but the gameplay was more balanced, more complicated... and the story while a little childish was a lot better as far as developments, pacing and logical progression.

There wasn't one aspect in which FFT is better then FFTA.

 

are you kidding me?

Its your opinion and all but when you think your opinion is fact, when MOST reviewers would completely disagree with you. Gametrailers themselves said that the story was complete rubbish and not even worth paying attention to. Seriously a story about a guy falling into a book? Just wow.

I would expect the gameplay to be more complicated...theyve had 10 years to work on it. But when FF tactics first game out it was the best around.

Actually it was a half done Tactics Ogre "ripoff".

The only reason ripoff is in parenthesis is that it was made by the same team... who so impressed with Tactics Ogre, Square pretty much bought to make a near copy.

Tactics Ogre was also better then Final Fantasy Tactics in just about every way.

 

i would not argue that at all. Ogre games are some of my favorites of all time.

 

I still remember playing that and ogre battle 64...man good time.s

 



Owner of all consoles cept DS.....Currently in love with prototype!

Kasz216 on 13 July 2008
Ajax said:

The story of FFT is told too complicated to get it the first time through the game for most people, but that's not only because of the script, but also because the story IS complicated, but so is Xenogears' plot, but fact remains, that the story of Tactics is great and one of the most mature around, it's a very tragic and sad story, but great.

 

The story is complicated... it's basically a stepped down simpler version of the Tactics Ogre story.

With the Church being Branta(with a little lodis thrown in), The Deathcorps being the Garganstans and Larg and crew being Duke Rongway and following the Walstanian nobles side.

With the Zodiac characters playing the parts of the Ogres.



the_bloodwalker on 13 July 2008
Kasz216 said:
Bingoo said:
Kasz216 said:
Ajax said:
Kasz216 said:

The Final Fnatasy Tactics Advance games are better then the original Final Fantasy tactics.

lol, this must the most funny comment of the month.

Laugh all you want, but the gameplay was more balanced, more complicated... and the story while a little childish was a lot better as far as developments, pacing and logical progression.

There wasn't one aspect in which FFT is better then FFTA.

 

are you kidding me?

Its your opinion and all but when you think your opinion is fact, when MOST reviewers would completely disagree with you. Gametrailers themselves said that the story was complete rubbish and not even worth paying attention to. Seriously a story about a guy falling into a book? Just wow.

I would expect the gameplay to be more complicated...theyve had 10 years to work on it. But when FF tactics first game out it was the best around.

Actually it was a half done Tactics Ogre "ripoff".

The only reason ripoff is in parenthesis is that it was made by the same team... who so impressed with Tactics Ogre, Square pretty much bought to make a near copy.

Tactics Ogre was also better then Final Fantasy Tactics in just about every way.

 

True, very true.



Oyvoyvoyv on 13 July 2008
Bingoo said:
Oyvoyvoyv said:
Ajax said:
Kasz216 said:

The Final Fnatasy Tactics Advance games are better then the original Final Fantasy tactics.

lol, this must the most funny comment of the month.

 

 I agree. It is so funny when people do not agree.

Also, he's not alone. You use GR a lot, so I'll use it against you too.

Final Fantasy Tactics: 82.9%.

 Final Fantasy Tactics Advanced: 87.7%

 

Ajax said:
People bashed Squaresoft, for rereleasing games on the PSX. But now that they port games to the DS, it's all good and fun all of a sudden. In other words, 'now that these ports are coming to a console you like, it's good all of a sudden'.

 

Wait, WHO bashed Squareshoft? In the PSX era, there wasn't a lot of Internet forums you know. Your friends may have bashed Squaresoft, but that doesn't mean the VGChartz community should.

I call your bluff. Show me 1 single thread made in the PSX era that bashes Squaresoft.

 

Also, Di8, I know you read the whole thread, I was just making sure you understood what he meant (it took me quite some time to understand it).

 

 Ok first off you can compare reviews of a 10 year old game to a new game, completely DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND SITES REVIEWING IT.

also

Final fantasy tactics the lion war -88

Advance-87.7

look before you post.

 

Wow, interesting post.

First - you just compared games from different generations. Exactly what you complained about me doing.

Second - look before you post. What did Ajax say? "the original Final Fantasy tactics.". Correct. The Original, not the lion war. You did, for some obscure reason, try to turn this into a discussion about whether the ones on Sony or Nintendo platforms are better. I have no intention of getting into that.

Third - Okay, so we have no proof at all about whether FFT or FFT:A is better. How the heck could you then write "are you kidding me?" to another person's post, simply because he disagreed with you.

Even though you're on the Internet, being nice is allowed. You could act mean to others, but remember that you don't have to.

 

 



http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261

That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS

Around the Network
Ajax on 13 July 2008

Oh now it's about Tactics Ogre all of a sudden. I might be mistaken, but I thought I read something about FFTA.



''Hadouken!''

Kasz216 on 13 July 2008
Ajax said:
Oh now it's about Tactics Ogre all of a sudden. I might be mistaken, but I thought I read something about FFTA.

That's the point.  Well one point anyway.

FFT was nothing but a clone of TO in almost everything. What it didn't take from there it took from FF5.

It was on a whole pretty unoriginal. Fun, but unoriginal. Unlike FFTA which evolved the genre and the series.

 



Ajax on 13 July 2008

Original FFT or Lions War, no real difference really, some anime and some script changes. I just beated Lions War two months ago.



''Hadouken!''

Ajax on 13 July 2008

Oh now it's problem is that it's not original. Just take a look around the world, and notice how many 'not original' things actually are great and rule.



''Hadouken!''

Kasz216 on 13 July 2008
Ajax said:
Oh now it's problem is that it's not original. Just take a look around the world, and notice how many 'not original' things actually are great and rule.

It's a problem when it's an inferior copy.

When compared to Tactics Ogre or Final Fantasy Tactics Advance which... well advanced just about everything in FFT.

What didn't you like about FFTA? Did the laws make the game too hard for you?

You can complain about the story... I guess if you don't really get it.

It's a decent story however about how living in a fantasy world is never healthy no matter how cool that reality is... and in the end you have to look at your problems and shortcomings in real life and deal with them rather then constantly hide.

A story that granted may be distrubing for your average videogame player... but still a story worth telling.