By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Tribunal ruling makes mockery of UK law

LNRT on 10 July 2008
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.



Around the Network
PS360ForTheWin on 10 July 2008
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?



mesoteto on 10 July 2008

srry 2x post



 

mesoteto on 10 July 2008
PS360ForTheWin said:
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?

 

because she has a right to follow her religion and b/c of homosexuality she had to go to court to protect her right...or are you just overlooking that one



 

LNRT on 10 July 2008
PS360ForTheWin said:
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?

I am not saying they do. But in this case they can't force her as an individual to do something that contratdicts her religious rights. It is a catch-22.



Around the Network
mesoteto on 10 July 2008
LNRT said:
PS360ForTheWin said:
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?

I am not saying they do. But in this case they can't force her as an individual to do something that contratdicts her religious rights. It is a catch-22.

i agree

 



 

PS360ForTheWin on 10 July 2008
mesoteto said:
PS360ForTheWin said:
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?

 

because she has a right to follow her religion and b/c of homosexuality she had to go to court to protect her right...or are you just overlooking that one

this is the same sort of rationale as terrorists use is it not?



PS360ForTheWin on 10 July 2008
LNRT said:
PS360ForTheWin said:
LNRT said:
dtewi said:
LNRT, but it is my opinion though.

You HAVE to have an opinion on that one.

That is fine that you think that way but the government can't place one higher than the other. I am not religious nor am I gay but I respect the rights of both as long as they don't impede upon each other or others rights and that is the issue here.

 

please do explain how homosexual rights impede other peoples rights?

I am not saying they do. But in this case they can't force her as an individual to do something that contratdicts her religious rights. It is a catch-22.

Religion cannot be proved, Homosexuality can

 



dtewi on 10 July 2008

I think what it ultimately boils down to is what is harmful and what is not.

Giving gay rights is only harmful if you want it to be.

Giving religious rights is harmful because it does harm, no matter how much or little you want it to.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

PS360ForTheWin on 10 July 2008
dtewi said:
I think what it ultimately boils down to is what is harmful and what is not.

Giving gay rights is only harmful if you want it to be.

Giving religious rights is harmful because it does harm, no matter how much or little you want it to.

 

i dont see how gay rights harm anyone, but i agree that religous rights allways cause harm