I think graphics will keep on improving until we reached real simulation similar to Holo-Deck in Star-Trek.

That'd be real awesome.

You can be Link, Samus, Master Chief, Cloud, Snake, Altair or whoever...

I'd so totally kick-ass =)

Wii is a step closer to that, I'd say...
I mean, we all already know graphics is achievable, but damn...

I got to give props when credit is due...

Nintendo managed to achieve a different form of gaming- interaction

 Trust me it wont..

Sony said that when it comes to making new hardware, they have to use the best graphics card available, and the best CPU.

I expect when the PS4 is released(last console from sony my prediction) graphics would be on par with photo realism. Also it would have extreemly more realistic controls than the wii does.

Then why did the PS3 use a GPU and CPU that were not the best available?

 Sony actually was the first to introduce the technology in a different way(not motion "controls").

It was completely ignored.

In mid 2006?

What graphics card was more advanced than the RSX? Also there is yet to be a stronger processing behemoth such as the CELL today.

@leo-j: Let's just say that the 360 came out earlier, and so far it seems any advantages the PS3 will get will be minimal.

You say so far, but we already have games that are much better looking on the PS3, not to mention the 360 has yet to top gears of war visually.

Which games might that be, and how many frames per second are they pushing?

GPU - Only the Xenos with its unified shader architecture and the G80 with its incredibly efficient architecture... I mean its only what, the 3rd most advanced GPU of its time?

CPU - Correction there is no CPU that delivers stronger floating point performance of its time.

Edit: "Processing behemoth" leaves nasty room for me to compare the Cell to an even more parellel processing unit - The GPU, so i'll call it the a CPU.