By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Soul Calibur IV announced on 360 and PS3 not on Wii in 2008

ckmlb on 12 June 2007
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
Legend11 said:
pmaster4 said:
No Soul Calibur not on the Wii is sad Namco is leaving money on the table.....again

Well the Wii is getting it's own exclusive Soul Calibur game so what's the problem? Why would anyone want a watered down port of a game on their system?


Precisely.


I said the same thing on the 3rd post. Its like no one listens...

Edit: NVM, I read the second sentence. I said the same thing without having to bash a game. I guess I was too neutral.


 Wait, what game was bashed? He was saying if there was a SC IV on Wii it would be a watered down one.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Around the Network
ckmlb on 12 June 2007
CameronHall1 said:
I hope this means each get character exclusives like on SC2. on 360 Master Cheif and on PS3 Kratos

Ok if this happens I will seriously fuckin' flip...

Kratos would fit so perfectly too cause he already has weapons, it makes perfect sense...

Would be godly. 



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

ckmlb on 12 June 2007
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
RolStoppable said:







 

 


I know that, and I cant predict either. But you never know what Sony/MS might want next time around. MY PREDICTION: Same graphics, smaller design, cheap. No graphics improvement. That is just me, though. Personaly, I am not looking forward to more realistic than what is available now.

Better graphics doesn't only mean more realistic, it means better looking be it artistic or realistic...

Also, 360 and PS3 can do more in AI and such and that is also always greeat to improve on. 



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Deguello on 12 June 2007

Apparently, more people wanted a watered down version of RE4 than the real version on GC.



ckmlb on 12 June 2007
Deguello said:
Apparently, more people wanted a watered down version of RE4 than the real version on GC.
Barely watered down compared to the mass flood of watering that will occur if SC IV is a great looking 360/PS3 game going to Wii.

 



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Around the Network
JDWolf36 on 12 June 2007

How does it make any type of sense that if one game is selling better on the Wii as a spin off than on the Xbox360/PS3 main line title that what you should do is keep investing loads into the main title and nothing more into the Wii. What makes sense is taking the third more you spent on that PS3/Xbox360 game investing it into 3 better looking Wii games. Don't understand the argument if people will buy a crappy Wii game just because they are interested in the genre it makes more sense to invest into that genre so you can produce more games, not go ohhh well they buy crap so lets just give them more and more of it. If this worked why does the Xbox360 have any games that look better than Perfect Dark Zero what would be the point it sold a million copies is in their top ten best selling why not make 3 billion more of the same type of game for less than it cost to make a game like Gears of War or Lost Planet people will buy them by this logic.



DonWii on 12 June 2007
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
DonWii said:
ckmlb said:
RolStoppable said:







 

 


I know that, and I cant predict either. But you never know what Sony/MS might want next time around. MY PREDICTION: Same graphics, smaller design, cheap. No graphics improvement. That is just me, though. Personaly, I am not looking forward to more realistic than what is available now.

Better graphics doesn't only mean more realistic, it means better looking be it artistic or realistic...

Also, 360 and PS3 can do more in AI and such and that is also always greeat to improve on.


Yeah. Art and realism. All depends on developers. I think there is more of a focus on realism than art. Sure, Gear of War is a nice mix of both, but I doubt the majority were looking at the art over the realism. Only few can really appreciate art in gaming.

As for AI, I concede to that point. Of course, I wouldnt say I was displeased with the AI in the PS2 games, but I can appreciate the AI improvements. 



DonWii on 12 June 2007


ckmlb on 12 June 2007
JDWolf36 said:
How does it make any type of sense that if one game is selling better on the Wii as a spin off than on the Xbox360/PS3 main line title that what you should do is keep investing loads into the main title and nothing more into the Wii. What makes sense is taking the third more you spent on that PS3/Xbox360 game investing it into 3 better looking Wii games. Don't understand the argument if people will buy a crappy Wii game just because they are interested in the genre it makes more sense to invest into that genre so you can produce more games, not go ohhh well they buy crap so lets just give them more and more of it. If this worked why does the Xbox360 have any games that look better than Perfect Dark Zero what would be the point it sold a million copies is in their top ten best selling why not make 3 billion more of the same type of game for less than it cost to make a game like Gears of War or Lost Planet people will buy them by this logic.

 Why do they need to do that if it's already selling?



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Legend11 on 12 June 2007
Deguello said:
Apparently, more people wanted a watered down version of RE4 than the real version on GC.

Umm because it wasn't watered down, RE4 for the Wii had extra content, and apparently it has widescreen.