just read the link ,,,atari is going abit crazy
http://kotaku.com/5018149/legal-mess-over-euro-alone-in-the-dark-reviews
what do you think?
haha WOW o_O
it sorta reminds me of Ubi when Assasin's Creed's gamesscore was revealed
(and it wasn't very good)
And man, i actually wanted to buy this for the Wii!
:/
Proud member of the Fierce Fox Force.
"I strike spurs onto my Wii controller. And against Sony and MS I fling myself,
unvanquished and unyielding. 'O Wii!!!"
-The Nintendian Philosophy
Wow. Way to cherry-pick the article.
DAMMIT!!!!
STOP CHERRY-PICKING!!!!
OT: Crap. I wanted this game to be awesome.
Well there you have it Spartan. The Xbox 360 now has a Haze-like HD exclusive (for about two months) 
.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
| starcraft said: DAMMIT!!!! STOP CHERRY-PICKING!!!! OT: Crap. I wanted this game to be awesome. Well there you have it Spartan. The Xbox 360 now has a Haze-like HD exclusive (for about two months) . |
What is it with you and making up exclusivity rules? :P
First console exclusive, now HD exclusive? Geez.
And this looks to be worse than Lair, amazingly enough.
makingmusic476 said:
What is it with you and making up exclusivity rules? :P First console exclusive, now HD exclusive? Geez. And this looks to be worse than Lair, amazingly enough. |
THREE!!!
Wow. The tech demos were so awesome too.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
starcraft said:
THREE!!! Wow. The tech demos were so awesome too.
|
This is what Phil left SCE for? And now we have SCE games getting canceled left and right. :'(
@starcraft
I didn't cherry pick ;P
they are calling anyone who gives them a bad review score and they threaten them with a lawsuit,,,,if konami restriction made such a fuss this should be a bigger deal.they are basicallu asking anyone who gives it a bad score to remove their review from the website:
"Gamer.no was the second publication in the world to publish a review, and we also gave it 3 out of 10. The review was based on a retail copy obtained from a store on Tuesday this week. Atari contacted us just minutes after it was published, claiming that our review is probably based on a preview or pirated copy, and requested it to be removed. We never removed it, of course."
I guess it's good that the PS3 version is delayed ,they MIGHT fix all the bugs in the game
| SpartanFX said: @starcraft I didn't cherry pick ;P they are calling anyone who gives them a bad review score and they threaten them with a lawsuit,,,,if konami restriction made such a fuss this should be a bigger deal.they are basicallu asking anyone who gives it a bad score to remove their review from the website: "Gamer.no was the second publication in the world to publish a review, and we also gave it 3 out of 10. The review was based on a retail copy obtained from a store on Tuesday this week. Atari contacted us just minutes after it was published, claiming that our review is probably based on a preview or pirated copy, and requested it to be removed. We never removed it, of course." I guess it's good that the PS3 version is delayed ,they MIGHT fix all the bugs in the game |
THIS TIME IT WAS A JOKE
Lol. With a score of three, the PS3 version won't be getting fixed unless its in development for another four years. I dont get why they didn't delay all versions. Is Atari THAT cash-strapped?
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
