Your opinions aren't facts. Don't present them as facts. This is your warning.

No i mean it, like every single one.

Lair was questioned about whether it was a good or bad game, it turned out bad.

Heavenly Sword was questioned, it turned out average.

Ratchet & Clank: TOD was questioned, it turned out good yet too short for everyone.

Resistance: FOM was questioned, turned out good yet gamers said "It's no Halo"

Motorstorm was questioned, turned out decent, yet gamers said "It's boring"

Killzone/Heavy Rain/Infamous/White Knight Story although have not been released yet, have all been put into question whether it will be good or not. 

- Killzone 1 for being bad, they don't have high hopes for KZ 2 even though Killzone Liberation was better

- Heavy Rain being too movie like, not enough gameplay.

- White Knight Story for not having an engaging battle system

Gran Turismo Prologue, despite excellent reviews, people say "It's a demo, not a real game"

Littlebigplanet in particular has recieved the most put into question, even though people who have played it said it is going to be the most innovative game ever, 360 fanboys in particular would say "What's the point of the game??"

Even MGS4 is being panned with "Too many cutscenes" or "Installs" despite it's gameplay being impressive.  

The biggest Irony is between Haze and Too Human. Both have recieved huge ass delays, yet it was Haze that was said to be not so good before it even came out which it wasn't. But for Too Human, people are saying it's going to be "Awesome" even though they were the same people who said delays is not a good thing for the game which means it isn't good. 

The point is, every single first party game Sony announces, it will be put into question and generally negative each time. Why is that? Why are first party Microsoft games always praised even without screenshots, trailers or little details of that game?