rocketpig said:
Reasonable said: Right now 360 has broader library but it clearly still does have reliability issues and if you plan on being online you need to consider paying for MS service vs Sony's service being free.
On flip side PS3 is without question more reliable product but it has weaker library overall (although i suspect this will cease to be the case by end of year or early 2009 at latest). PS3 does get you BR if that is of interest.
I'd say have a good long look at what exclusives are known for each for at least next 12 months - i.e. 360 will have Fable and LO but PS3 will have FF plus GT5 & MGS and White Knight Story (I think that's the title) - and see which titles appeals most to you.
Multi-platform titles (of quality) are essentially the same on each now (despite pixel pouring fanboys). If you look at DMC4 or Asssassins' Creed or Burnout Paradise (or GTA IV) on a typical setup then to the average joe they look and play the same.
If I was to consider a 'tilt' approach I'd probably suggest the PS3 might be better for you as in the long run I think its more likely it will end up with a more diverse library (particularly outside of shooters) than 360 - but of course that's just my own feeling.
Or you could get a PC!
|
Your name may be Reasonable but you did a pretty good job of slighting the 360 with that lineup listing. By the end of the year: 360: Splinter Cell: Conviction Fable 2 Infinite Undiscovery Too Human Halo Wars Banjo Kazooie 3 Ninja Gaiden II
For the PS3, I'll extend into next year (a little unfair I know but since the OP doesn't like FPS, the PS3 lineup is a little weak in 2008): LittleBigPlanet FFXIII GT5 White Knight Story MGS4 By the middle of 2008, I think the lineups between the two will be comparable. The PS3 will have fewer games but more blockbusters (GT5, MGS, FF). On the other hand, the 360 will have an absolute mountain of 80+% games by that point but not quite as many blockbuster games. |
Nope - I just put in a few of the top of my head for each... as I stated I was expecting the OP to look up the full lists (although you've handily done some of the work for them) and that was my advice so there was no intent to slight anything. All I was doing was pointing out each will have exclusives and that's going to be what's different between them.
I didn't know people were so touchy you had to be careful to make sure that if you mention 4 games for PS3 you must mention 4 for 360, or that you must use 360 same amout of times as PS3. I wrote a short un-biased view that said compare each consoles pros/cons (as both have them, neither is perfect) and then look to the titles which attract you most, and as a few more titles were known to me for PS3 than 360 I listed them and advised him to look up rest... you're saying that's biased?
Seems anyone with a 360 or a PS3 is just jumping on anything right now they think is remotely a slight on their system.