By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Best Graphics of 2008? Empire: Total War.

psrock on 12 May 2008
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 


AFRIKA, DUDE . j/k



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
Around the Network
Tormod on 12 May 2008

This game looks atrocious.



sc94597 on 12 May 2008
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 


AFRIKA, DUDE . j/k


 I don't get it?



shio on 12 May 2008
Tormod said:
This game looks atrocious.

How so?

http://i48.tinypic.com/120qaon.jpg
obieslut on 12 May 2008

SHIO for the love of god change the picture ypu ar eusing then mabe we will see what you are getting at



Around the Network
psrock on 12 May 2008
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 


AFRIKA, DUDE . j/k


 I don't get it?


AFRIKA will change that.

 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
obieslut on 12 May 2008

come on put some better screens on then.



sc94597 on 12 May 2008
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 


AFRIKA, DUDE . j/k


I don't get it?


AFRIKA will change that.

Yeah, but will afrika have 1,000s of npcs doing animations at the same time. I don't thinks so.



obieslut on 12 May 2008
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 


AFRIKA, DUDE . j/k


I don't get it?


AFRIKA will change that.

Yeah, but will afrika have 1,000s of npcs doing animations at the same time. I don't thinks so.


 i dont really care about how many things that can move on the screen all at once i mean come on, whats the point in having like a couple of thousand things on the screen moving at once it the things moving all look like a fuzzy piece of crap



sc94597 on 12 May 2008
See More Empire: Total War Various at IGN.com

See More Empire: Total War Various at IGN.com

See More Empire: Total War Screenshot at IGN.com