By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Best Graphics of 2008? Empire: Total War.

obieslut on 12 May 2008

oh please pull the ither one. i mean comeoff it. since when do them picks even come close to the best of 2008. GT5P comes to mind but not this funny looking recolection of complete and utter rubbish



Around the Network
bobobologna on 12 May 2008

Ew. Say no to jpeg compression artifacts. Someone make a new thread when some good high quality screenshots come out.

I hope you can disable DOF effects. Totally out of place in an RTS.



psrock on 12 May 2008

my problem is you create a thread about the best looking game of 2008 and you chose the worst looking pic to prove your point. I could care less about this game, but from what you have shown, it doesnt look like the best at all. Far from it.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
cattmanndann on 12 May 2008

yea it looks good but not the best graphics.... i know theres a million things moving at once but still that dosent give it good graphics



sc94597 on 12 May 2008
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks. 



Around the Network
psrock on 12 May 2008
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks. 


i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
sc94597 on 12 May 2008
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

 I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game. 



psrock on 12 May 2008
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

 I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game. 


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
sc94597 on 12 May 2008
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
sc94597 said:
psrock said:
shio said:
psrock said:
to be fair, you gave us the worst looking screen shot to look. I frankly dont see how good the game look. Find us the mind blowing pic for your $ 4000 pc, then make your claim.

First, the shots aren't of highest quality and they were cut off in half because of the forum(see the neogaf link for the full pics). Second, there will be thousands of units moving onscreen at the same time. That is far superior to GTA IV technically.

 

why did you bring GTA into this, Graphic are not its strong point.

It is technically amazing rather than graphically. It loads huge areas with decent graphics. Graphics aren't all about how good a game looks.


 

i love the game, the details are amazing, but its not best looking of any game though.

I know , but you have to understand this is more of what shio means. He means how much it would push the hardware. This is determined by how big the world X how good it looks. Graphics aren't only how good a game looks. It's more than that. If he wanted to just talk about looks he would ask if it was the best looking game.


but it's part of it. All i want is some better shot, the one he posted dont do the game justice.

Well the quality is , bad. You won't see anything significantly better though. The game has much more going on than any game on the ps360, and for having so much going the "looks" are brought down so people could actually play the game. If this game had crysis lvl visuals, you would probably need a $6,000 dollar pc to run it.

 



obieslut on 12 May 2008

psrock is right. why post that a perticular game has the best graphics then pick the worst picks to prove it