By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Skies of Arcadia 2 will announce for the Wii this year

Words Of Wisdom on 12 May 2008
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:

We have proof that the engine can do one kind of game and that game is Valkyria Chronicles.

If you want to say the engine can do more kinds of games than that, you need to prove it. ^_^

Engines have always (since the NES era) been assumed to be specific to a game/genre until shown otherwise. Traditionally all game engines have been specific to their series. The idea of multi-use engines is actually a fairly new one AFAIK that has only really come into the fore in the last generation.


YOU ARE MAKING THE CLAIM. Stop pretending otherwise.


Settle down there.  Take a deep breath and relax.

I have stated my opinion and nothing more.  If you think my opinion is incorrect, I encourage you to prove otherwise.  If you can't then simply agree to disagree and move on.  Either way this isn't something to get worked up over.



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight on 12 May 2008

No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Words Of Wisdom on 12 May 2008
LordTheNightKnight said:
No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.

Hmm okies.  LordTheNightKnight, you're absolutely right about everything and I completely agree with your point of view.  

Will that satisfy you so we can go back to discussing this thread productively?



elgefe02 on 12 May 2008

One of the best RPGS that i Remember playing, I hope the rumour is true..
Day 1 purchase



SSBB FC: 5155 2671 4071 elgefe02: "VGChartz's Resident Raving Rabbit"   MKWii:5155-3729-0989

Riachu on 12 May 2008

I heard the first SoA was awesome so if there really is one, I will start looking forward to it. I will probably play the first one at some point



 

http://www.youtube.com/user/InvaderZimGuy1?feature=mhum

Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight on 12 May 2008
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.

Hmm okies. LordTheNightKnight, you're absolutely right about everything and I completely agree with your point of view.

Will that satisfy you so we can go back to discussing this thread productively?

 

If you aren't going to argue, then don't bring up points you can't defend.

Anyway, I thought you knew that these days, engines are for general development, because they save costs. Thus making an engine for one genre, that Sega isn't even heavy in, would be counterproductive.

If it was Nippon Ichi, then yes that would make sense. Sega is a more general developer, so would thus need a general engine. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Words Of Wisdom on 12 May 2008
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.

Hmm okies. LordTheNightKnight, you're absolutely right about everything and I completely agree with your point of view.

Will that satisfy you so we can go back to discussing this thread productively?

 

If you aren't going to argue, then don't bring up points you can't defend.

Anyway, I thought you knew that these days, engines are for general development, because they save costs. Thus making an engine for one genre, that Sega isn't even heavy in, would be counterproductive.

If it was Nippon Ichi, then yes that would make sense. Sega is a more general developer, so would thus need a general engine.

I'd argue with you but this is absolutely the wrong thread to be arguing any of the things you want to argue. Please talk about something productive here.

If you want to argue about single/franchise use engines versus flexible engines, do so in another thread.

LordTheNightKnight on 12 May 2008
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.

Hmm okies. LordTheNightKnight, you're absolutely right about everything and I completely agree with your point of view.

Will that satisfy you so we can go back to discussing this thread productively?

 

If you aren't going to argue, then don't bring up points you can't defend.

Anyway, I thought you knew that these days, engines are for general development, because they save costs. Thus making an engine for one genre, that Sega isn't even heavy in, would be counterproductive.

If it was Nippon Ichi, then yes that would make sense. Sega is a more general developer, so would thus need a general engine.

I'd argue with you but this is absolutely the wrong thread to be arguing any of the things you want to argue. Please talk about something productive here.

If you want to argue about single/franchise use engines versus flexible engines, do so in another thread.

If I had brought it up, instead, you know, you, that would be a valid point.

The thing is that your claim that CANVAS will only work on SRPGs is faulty, because it would mean Sega would have a whole engine to develop with, and only one genre, that they don't even specialize in.

EDIT: I recognize the old try-to-drop-the-argument-because-you've-been-proven wrong trick. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

sc94597 on 12 May 2008
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
No, if you were just stating it, you would not be insisting it when challenged. Now that we're calling on you for proof, you're pretending it's not that important. If if wasn't important, you should have stated so at the FIRST reply, not just now.

And just because I got upset does not mean you get to pretend you have some high ground here. You don't even know why I was upset.

Hmm okies. LordTheNightKnight, you're absolutely right about everything and I completely agree with your point of view.

Will that satisfy you so we can go back to discussing this thread productively?

 

If you aren't going to argue, then don't bring up points you can't defend.

Anyway, I thought you knew that these days, engines are for general development, because they save costs. Thus making an engine for one genre, that Sega isn't even heavy in, would be counterproductive.

If it was Nippon Ichi, then yes that would make sense. Sega is a more general developer, so would thus need a general engine.

I'd argue with you but this is absolutely the wrong thread to be arguing any of the things you want to argue. Please talk about something productive here.

If you want to argue about single/franchise use engines versus flexible engines, do so in another thread.

If I had brought it up, instead, you know, you, that would be a valid point.

The thing is that your claim that CANVAS will only work on SRPGs is faulty, because it would mean Sega would have a whole engine to develop with, and only one genre, that they don't even specialize in.

Would canvas run on the  wii?

 



Imperial on 12 May 2008

Skies of arcadia on the DC rocked , PLEASE GIVE US A PS3 release .I need to see that game in HD.