By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Can we get rid of the other section 8

I know, I need sleep too... its one hour later here than it is by you :)... bottom line for today:

 

This thread is like the catholic summer-camp I went to... everyone felt violated :) ....ZING



 

 

 

Around the Network
ioi said:
I'm not going to budge guys. I am not happy with section 8 and i feel it will be both an annoyance and a threat to vgchartz.

At the end of the day it is going to come down to making a choice between here and there.

Well, this would involve closing Section 8.1. And if you are worried about recruiting, obviously the best thing to do would be to allow you to monitor the amount of members on the site. If they really just want a place to chat freely, a 20 member forum should be more than sufficient for this. As you said, 50 members is too much to argue as a group of close friends. If Kenzo agreed to shut that place down and start up a forum for just friends with no possibilities of expansion there shouldn't be any fears of taking over membership. Unfortunately, it's hard to continue this discussion without Kenzo...



naznatips said:

Okay, well let's back up to your 3 original problems ioi and see if we can resolve some of it.

1. 50 people on a forum is more than a friends group. ~10-15 I can handle, but anything more than that smacks of being competition to the main site and will inevitably take you guys away from posting on here. What happens when it gets to 100 or 200 or 500 members?

2. The minute all this stuff began about posting signatures on May the 8th, the secret codes, the hidden messages, you invaded vgchartz and made it my business. I don't understand it. If you genuinely want a private area where you can chat to others, why all this rubbish? Why not just go there and chat?

3. Upon then reading the threads in more detail I have become angry about what seems to be (and of course I could be wrong) the true purpose of the forum - see my quotes and my comments. I personally dislike people who think they are above others and I'm sorry but that is exactly how things come across to me. I'd love to be proven wrong.

#2 is fixed. They agreed the sigs were a bad idea, and won't be doing that again.

Let's work on problem #1 and #3. Would you agree to allow them to continue to exist if they closed down Section 8.1, and created a new forum with only 20 members, and no recruiting. Say they gave you an account to allow you to check and make sure nothing was being done to recruit. This could easily be argued as nothing but a close group of friends. Is that possible ioi?


1. We never wanted to be more that 50 or so... we where still figuring out who wants what friends in but it would never have gotten more than 50-60... much les is more likely...

3. There never where elitist ideas or badmouthing involved in the principles of sec8, ssj12 even was a mod there to secure that VGChartz rules still apply...

So if we stop inviting members up to the number of say 50 and we give ioi or a mod of his choice the ability to check if everything is going normaly there we are good ??? As I said before I can´t speak for everyone at sec 8 but this does sound like a fair compromise...



 

 

 

We should probably resolve this topic till later. Kenzo should be a part of this discussion obviously as the owner of S8.1, and ioi and others of course need to sleep.



i am liking to way this is going now, thank you guys.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
Around the Network

ioi said:
I'm not going to budge guys. I am not happy with section 8 and i feel it will be both an annoyance and a threat to vgchartz. (I fail to see how a forum that hardly anyone goes to is an annoyance... let alone a threat...)

At the end of the day it is going to come down to making a choice between here and there.

(Perhaps there is a better way of solving this problem then seeing it as black or white... naz already suggested a comfortable gray zone that seems very acceptable for everybody... we may need to work out the kinks but thats just a formality...) 


 



 

 

 

naznatips said:
We should probably resolve this topic till later. Kenzo should be a part of this discussion obviously as the owner of S8.1, and ioi and others of course need to sleep.
  I agree.

I would like to start by saying I am more then willing to compromise, and feel NAZ’s suggestions are more then applicable. I will go into my thoughts on that in a minute but first I would like to apologies for everything that has lead to this point.

I feel that everyone here can appreciate the fact that we are only human and sometimes our emotions get the best of us. I know in my own life I have said things to loved ones I do not mean, and I have said things about them that they may not appreciate when they are out of the room. I think we have all been there, and know that those times do not reflect are true feelings of someone.

As to my thoughts on the compromise, I like what has been said. 20 members would be fine with me. No recruiting almost goes without saying at this point. Closing it down is fine though I prefer to keep the same address for the new one. So is this something we can work out?



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1

How exactly is recruitment here controlled? They get voted in by members, how is that different from the other section 8, and why is that labelled an elitest society?



@ ioi, how do you remove the 30 other users? You cannot just ask them to leave without insulting many of them