jpain333 said:
|
jpain333 said:
|
Munkeh111 said:
|
TheRealMafoo said:
I have seen you post dozens of times in forums associated with GTA4, and not a single one of them that I read could be construed as being positive towards the game. They aren't negative either. The clostest thing was that some of the reviews ignored the crash glitches, which is about the reviewers not the game. In fact, most of my comments were on fallacies of the posters, like assuming posting on threads about the game means I have an opinion on it. You don't have the game. You are no going to be getting the game in the near future (as you don't have a console to play it on). Why do you have such an interest in this topic? Why were any of us interested months before it came out? Because we wanted to know. Duh. P.S. If the game has 4 places you can make a choice, that means there are 16 posable paths through the story line. How many different outcomes are required before he is not lying? Wait. I just saw the part about the 4 choices, not about the 16 paths. That is a difference. You could have the choices presented in a way that still means all the choices are the same. If a large part of the storyline changes, even if not up to the ending, that is a choice. |
Since I don't have the game yet, I didn't know what the choice system was like, and the OP comment made it look more restrictive than it actually is. If you notice, your comment was the first time multiple story paths was actually mentioned.
BTW, 4 choices would lead to just about 10 storylines, less if overlap. Yet that's still plenty for replay value.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs