By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Obama criticizes parents instead of GTA? *faints*

MaxwellGT2000 said:
Obama has got a good head on his shoulders he's already proven that a few times, I do feel he could easily be very secretive and do some things he shouldn't as most charismatic people do (JFK I'm looking at you) but hes done much better then Hillary who has done nothing but proven her stupidity over the years. McCain may get it though... I am republican but I just don't know if I support McCain he just seems to be hiding behind the whole Obama vs Hillary thing and not speaking his mind a whole lot, which may be good that he doesn't prove he's an idiot like Clinton.

JFK. Now there is an overrated president.

He had lot of highs.... but a lot of lows as well in his presidency.



Around the Network
luinil said:

This is no reason to fall in love with a man who is friendly with terrorists... Sheesh its a cult of personality...

edit: but this is a good thing that he understands. It is the parents who need to take responsibility... but we are talking about the Baby Boomer Generation here... the most selfish generation America has ever seen.


 You wouldn't be referring to the terrorist that Bill Clinton pardoned would you?



rocketpig said:
I can't move threads or I already would have done it.

Must have confused with other boards. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

rocketpig said:
ssj12 said:
hmm Obama might have my vote.. na im voting Nader

You're going from Ron Paul to Ralph Nader?

*confused* 


 Ron Paul can't win, Nader is 3rd aprty and is in the race for president instantly because of that.

Ron Paul = Good for Liberties and Economics

Ralph Nader = Good for Economics and Global Market

 
Since the better hope for the country lost I might as well go for the 2nd best candidate.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Darc Requiem said:
luinil said:

This is no reason to fall in love with a man who is friendly with terrorists... Sheesh its a cult of personality...

edit: but this is a good thing that he understands. It is the parents who need to take responsibility... but we are talking about the Baby Boomer Generation here... the most selfish generation America has ever seen.


 You wouldn't be referring to the terrorist that Bill Clinton pardoned would you?

Yeah he went there.

 



Around the Network
Darc Requiem said:
luinil said:

This is no reason to fall in love with a man who is friendly with terrorists... Sheesh its a cult of personality...

edit: but this is a good thing that he understands. It is the parents who need to take responsibility... but we are talking about the Baby Boomer Generation here... the most selfish generation America has ever seen.


You wouldn't be referring to the terrorist that Bill Clinton pardoned would you?


 Nope, I was referring to William Ayers.



luinil said:

This is no reason to fall in love with a man who is friendly with terrorists... Sheesh its a cult of personality...

edit: but this is a good thing that he understands. It is the parents who need to take responsibility... but we are talking about the Baby Boomer Generation here... the most selfish generation America has ever seen.


You are dismissing Ayers as just a 'terrorist'? Read up a little on this wikipedia article about him

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

YOU sounded like Fox News on that post



 

It is better to die on one's feet

then live on one's knees

You sign up to rebuff me, even though Ayers said that he doesn't regret bombing and wishing he had done more... and then you link me to a WIKIPEDIA article about this man? Come on. You can do better than that. You sound like a mindless democrat who votes for his party no matter what.



POINT LUI!!!!!!



 

I can see the larger context beyond gaming. We have far too many pandering politicians as is, and we have far too many politicians on the prowl for defenseless scapegoats to hang the woes of society upon. How terribly easy is it to blame violence or delinquency on games, movies, music, or drugs. All you need is to look tough on things that millions of people hate. Not that you actually have to do anything beyond saying you dislike it.

These things aren't the problem, and playing to them being the problem is never going to solve the problem. You cannot cure blindness by amputating a leg. The closer to the source of a problem you are the more effectively you can treat the problem. Instead of blaming the media, and doing nothing. You should be asking why so many parents are doing such a poor job. How can you help these parents do a better job. How can you augment failing parents with positive role models for children.

Despite what many people think programs that address these problems are having a positive impact upon society. After school programs, sports programs, tutoring, and community groups all support the family. They are many times more effective then legislating morality that must be enforced. Save a little money on police, and put it into things that prevent poor behavior in the first place.

We need more politicians that do not pander, do not placate, and are actually interested in resolving problems. Rather then someone who is going to sit on their ass for four years, and play to the status quo. Why do we have the war on drugs. For example how is this helping society at all. The answer it isn't locking up three or four million people is only going to shatter families. Breed superior maladjusted criminals, and thus create more violent crime. This will never change as long as we elect pandering politicians. They are less interested in solving problems logically then pandering to niche constituencies.

I also do not think this hurts Democrats either. All it does is garner more recognition to the democratic platform. The Republicans screwed up by not having a better field. The Democrats are going to dominate the air waves for months, and the Republicans are going to be forgotten. That is the irony more screen time will create a greater sense of recognition.