By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Sony & Xbox fanboys slugging it out on Wikipedia

The "real" thing is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Wageslave

But for some reason, the person being accused responded here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wageslave

 

I found it pretty funny.



Around the Network

Who ever Wageslave is, he sure does love his Xbox 360.



SSBB: 1977-0005-2980 (JOEY) MKWii: 4382-2877-5902 (Joeykanga)
Wii:4027-0084-9432-1532             PM me if you add me.
Tag courtesy of fkusumot: Joeykanga - "Just post something once, don't ruin the thread"

Omg he REALLY has no life if he is editing wikipedia stuff just to take down the wii and ps3.



This part is interesting:

Also you said, quote, "GTAIII:VC/SA" - why are you constantly trying to go back and rewrite history in regards to these games? Are you that desperate to make people believe that the DLC will be so huge and impressive that you must rewrite history to claim that VC and SA were just expansions to GTA 3 and not full games? The games are called GTA: Vice City and GTA: San Andreas, not GTA III: Vice City/GTA III San Andreas. Vice City was the sequel to 3, and San Andreas was the sequel to Vice City - not "expansion packs"



it sounds like he's a microsoft employee or at least the worlds biggest microsoft fanboy because its not just gaming stuff that he's messing with.

 

Removes any mention of Mac OS X, seemingly to promote Microsoft Windows.

Creates the illusion[24] that MS's WorldWide Telescope is praised by all.

He removes criticism of Microsoft's new operating system, Windows Vista.

He removes mention of Internet Explorer's main rival, Mozilla Firefox, from this article.

thats just a small sampling 


 



Around the Network

Lol, sad.



PSN ID: clemens-nl                                                                                                                

lmao



  3DS FC: 4355-9313-6815

Starcraft is this your wiki account?? Sound just like you.



What's sad is that many people judge wikipedia's credibility based on fanboy written articles instead of on scientific articles, which are generally as accurate as paper encyclopedias, yet more up to date and less prone to vandalism.



Jesus, this dude needs to get laid. Three times a day at least...