Of course my perspective would be different, because the people posting in this thread would be very different if Harris had won. Quality of discussion is heavily dependent on who posts and what they post.

There's no need to put NFL joke in quotations, because it was a joke and never a scientific analysis.

But, I bet you were hoping, from the beginning, that it would play out and then you could say something like "Hey look guys, my NFL analysis outperformed Chrkeller's betting firms"

If I wanted to beat Chrkeller over the head with something, I'd just quote him directly and do it instead of running a month-long scheme.

Yeah, but only AFTER a Harris victory.  

Regardless of topic. Nobody of us here posts exclusively in this thread.

The key ingredient that is missing in the scheme you suggest is that Chrkeller isn't a Trump supporter. Why would anyone who was for Harris in this election go to the lengths you suggest for the purpose of sticking it to someone who voted for Harris?

Because you were targeting his support of the betting firms. Prior to this election, he was the only poster who pointed out what the betting firms were saying and was being ridiculed by others at the time.

You mean he was being ridiculed in a similar way as you did to me when you responded to my initial NFL post. Does that make you one of the bad guys?

But, wasn't your initial NFL post the start of a running joke? So, why not ridicule it?

Because it's pointless to get worked up over a joke. It was back then when you first did it, and it's just as pointless now.

Why are you so invested in this anyway?

But, you never ADMITTED to it being a joke until after the election was over.  

Do you remember my initial reply to your NFL post?

I said "Seriously?" But I never got a direct reply from you on that question, you just continued to run with your NFL scheme.

----------------------------

I'm only invested in this discussion as much as you are.