That's great.  Now get the Republican party leaders to also condemn it, to stop calling those arrested and charged as 'heroes', to also admit it was their own rhetoric that incited it. 

It wasn't

Dems need to condemn BLM, Antifa, and such as a whole or they're no better

Antifascism is better than fascism. Protesting police brutality is better than police brutality. Equating the former to the latter because they're not always peaceful is high grade false equivalence.

BLM and Antifa are responses.  They exist because a fomenting injustice exists.  

And the BLM/Antifa violence was condemned by Democratic leaders.  And I won't link articles for you because you either won't read them or will find some excuse anyway.

So not only are they different in those respects but here is the biggest difference of all: The left isn't threatening more violence like the right is. The right surreptitiously hopes for another J6 style event. 

And if you ask them they're in support of fascism?  If you ask someone who got their business burned down by BLM they still think it's about police brutality?  You're giving the worst version of one vs the pristine version of the other.  C'mon that's just ridiculous to describe them that way.  Higher grade bias than any false equivalence you were trying to draw.  

They encourage more of that behavior every day trying to paint their enemies the way they do.  It's an escalation that's unprecedented and now they select Walz who seemed to love burning of Minneapolis.  Condemn his response to the riots or you lose all credibility.

You're absolutely right that only a deplorable, creditless person would deem his response enough.

https://apnews.com/article/tim-walz-trump-audio-riots-george-floyd-3b349ec2a8611f242333b76512a82d4f

The further left or right you go, the more they are the same.

Best place is in the center.

You don't listen to Trump, Vance or any other R leader, do you?  You just described them.

And Trump loved the way Walz handled Minneapolis.  So was Trump wrong?  

No he does listen to them.

It's just when Trump says to hit someone in the face he's just being metaphorical.

Or when he suggests that there will be no violence when he wins.

Or when he suggests that 2nd amendment people might fix a problem.

The real violence is when he gets called out for saying all these weird things.