Saudi Arabia spearheads attempts to find alternative to Trump’s Gaza plan: Report
We have been reporting on Arab-led efforts to formulate an alternative to President Trump’s plan to empty Gaza of its population.
Saudi Arabia is reportedly spearheading those efforts, the Reuters news agency reports, citing 10 anonymous sources familiar with the matter.
The sources said draft ideas will be discussed at a meeting in the Saudi capital Riyadh later this month, with Egypt, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates planning to attend.
One unnamed Arab government source said at least four proposals had already been drafted for Gaza’s future, but an Egyptian proposal has emerged as a preferred alternative to Trump’s plan.
The details of that plan have yet to be announced. But five of the sources said proposals include a Gulf-led reconstruction fund and efforts to sideline Hamas from future governance in Gaza.
Hope for Gaza’s future but it cannot include Hamas: Israeli analyst
Uri Dromi, founding director-general of the Jerusalem Press Club and a retired colonel in the Israeli Air Force, says he hopes to see the release of both Israeli captives and Palestinian prisoners so that Gaza can more forward to a better future.
However, that future must not involve Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, he told Al Jazeera.
“There is one major condition – that is that Hamas, of course Islamic Jihad – cannot be part of the reconstruction of Gaza because just look at the stage they built in Khan Younis,” he said.
“Two things come to mind immediately. One is the empty slogans and promises to go to Jerusalem and the second thing is the destroyed house behind the stage, which is the reality that the Gaza people got from Hamas,” he said.
“So I think in order to move ahead, we should, for the benefit of all people around here, rebuild Gaza and give people in Gaza a horizon. But Hamas cannot be part of that,” he added.
There is no other choice... You made sure of that by continuously undermining and corrupting the PA, while funding Hamas to drive a wedge between Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza. Now you have to live with your creation as Hamas is the only government available right now. The transition to a new moderate government has to be done through elections. The people have to decide who will represent them, not Israel nor the US.
Hamas survival signals ‘strategic failure’ for Israel in Gaza
The message after about 16 months of war on Gaza is clearly that a military solution has not been viable for Israel, says Muhanad Seloom of the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies.
“What we’re seeing here is a strategic failure for Israel, because for a non-state actor to survive is basically victory. And for a state, not being able to eradicate a group by using military means is failure,” he told Al Jazeera.
“Hamas is probably going to be part of the governing bodies of Gaza in the next phase or once the three phases of the ceasefire are done, but they are definitely part of the negotiations leading to that stage.”
Seloom said the large amount of killing and destruction did not actually bear fruit for Israel. So, the country is now trying to push through, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying he wants to resume military operations in Gaza.
“I don’t think it is something most countries would support, even though the Trump administration is entertaining the idea. I think it’s mostly rhetoric rather than realpolitik,” he said.
‘New Marshall Plan’ needed for Gaza
Uri Dromi, founding director-general of the Jerusalem Press Club and a retired colonel in the Israeli Air Force, has told Al Jazeera that the reconstruction of Gaza is unlikely to start “as long as Hamas and [Palestinian] Islamic Jihad are pulling the strings”.
“We need a new Marshall Plan for Gaza where Europe, the United States, the Gulf states and Israel should be involved in the reconstruction. But as long as Hamas and [Palestinian] Islamic Jihad are calling the shots, that is not going to happen,” he said, referring to a US initiative to aid Europe after the end of World War II.
Dromi did not mention the need for the Palestinian people to be involved in making plans for the future of their own territory.