Unsealed court documents suggest Trump admin detained Tufts student for writing op-ed critical of Israel
Newly unsealed court documents show the Trump administration did not have evidence that Tufts University PhD student Rümeysa Öztürk was supporting terrorist activity when she was arrested and her visa was revoked, and the action was taken because of an opinion article she wrote that contained criticisms of Israel.
The documents, related to legal cases of students whose visas were revoked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and who were threatened with deportation last year, also show the administration found it difficult to find evidence to support the revocation of Öztürk’s visa.
In most of the cases, including that of student activist Mahmoud Khalil, the documents show the administration made its recommendations to revoke visas based on the students’ involvement in protests criticizing Israel’s war in Gaza, despite arguments from the administration of antisemitism and support for terrorism. The administration also acknowledged it would likely face scrutiny in court given the protections granted by the First Amendment.
The New York Times was first to report on the unsealed documents.
Last March, Rubio posted on X that they “will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.”
That same month, Öztürk was detained by a plain-clothed police officer outside her home. The administration sought to deport her after revoking her student visa. The Tufts PhD student had written an opinion piece, along with three other students, criticizing the university’s response to student activists who demanded that Tufts “acknowledge the Palestinian genocide,” disclose its investments and divest from companies with ties to Israel.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/23/politics/court-documents-student-israel-op-ed
All this is only making (real) anti-semitism worse.
My wife got targeted last night. She's an antique reseller with an online store and was updating prices of old inventory. She had a couple of Star of David jewelry pieces listed from around the turn of the 19th century and updating the prices (since sterling silver prices are skyrocketing along with gold) bumped them back into search algorithms I guess. Not an hour later she was receiving threatening messages including nonsense like go to Epstein island among slurs and other foul language.
She reported the hate messages, blocked the idiots, and delisted the items. They were listed since 2013, not worth making a stand for. But she rightly said, Jewish people just can't catch a break. Either prosecuted or indoctrinated / conflated with the actions of Zionist fanatics. Judiasm != Zionism. Definitely not what Zionism has turned into.
She can't list some native American jewelry either since they contain the Swastika ("whirling log" (tsil no'oli) by the Navajo or a symbol for the "four winds") as well as Hindu pieces containing the Swastika (Surya) meaning "conducive to well-being" or "good fortune", and the left facing version "sauvastika" (卍) is better avoided as well thanks to the Nazi party's Hakenkreuz. And now it looks like the Star of David is facing the same cultural appropriation by the the Neo Zionists of Israel and of course the Israeli flag.
It seems Christian jewelry is still safe, for now. At least no genocidal country has put the catholic cross on their flag. The Dominican Republic has a small cross on their flag but not known for colonial genocide (although Haitians probably disagree, see Trujillo)
At least the Russians were original with the Hammer and Sickle design.







