Two Russian colonels mysteriously ‘fall from upper-floor windows’, say reports

https://tvpworld.com/84872142/two-russian-colonels-mysteriously-fall-from-upper-floor-windows

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I guess the Russians were the ones who did this to their own officers. The Russians prefer to throw you from windows, and Ukraine likes to blow people up.

Russian anti-war musician dies after falling out of window during police search

https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2025/02/06/russian-anti-war-musician-dies-after-falling-out-of-window-during-police-search-en-news

Elon Musk Shares Fake Video Claiming USAID Paid Hollywood Stars to Promote Zelenskyy | UNITED24 Media

Elon Musk is a Nazi Cunt.

Newsweek is reporting that Ukraine is renewing an offensive in Kursk: https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-launches-renewed-kursk-offensive-reports-2027218

Which is a great plan, IMHO. Many pundits believed that it was a bad move when they tried this in 2024, but as we now see in hindsight, the Russians couldn't do enough to expel them from the area, and created a lot of havoc for the Russians. Enough so its pushed North Korean involvement which already faltered due to the unmitigated slaughter of DPRK troops.

Hopefully this offensive can force a battered, tattered Russian military beyond the brink.

It'll likely be limited but I always thought the offensive into Kursk made sense, I'm pretty sure it was done in part because there was a lot of fear and rumours that Trump would stop aid to Ukraine and force them to negotiate with Russia, Ukraine surrenders the territory that Russia has stolen in exchange for "peace" but by taking part of Kursk, Russia would likewise have to agree to surrender territory in exchange for "peace" so it makes it even harder for anyone to pressure Ukraine into a shitty deal as long as they hold onto Kursk.

That and distracting Russian troops.

I still think the 2023 offensive should have been invading Russia instead of charging directly into the frontline, it's clear that the Russian border isn't well defended, but the West back then didn't have the stomach to allow Ukraine to invade Russia. I feel like it still makes more sense to invade into Russia and then double back into Ukraine, hitting behind Russian fortifications, right now if they try a counteroffensive in Ukraine itself they're just charging into a shit load of mines, artillery, drones, trenches and other Russian fortifications so it results in heavy losses.

Strategic offensives have strategic goals.

"Invade into Russia and double back"accomplishes nothing.

It makes sense for Kiev regime's only strategic offensive to have proper,strategic goal that accomplishes something at least on paper.

And with claims like this,made by alleged British tank commander,how could it fail?

Reality is that some people don't get the basics.

"Russia would likewise have to agree to surrender territory"

Like,why?It's not about who controls what at the end of the conflict,it's about accomplishing war goals.

During final stages of WW1,German forces were within firing range from Paris.Spoiler alert:Germany didn't get to keep that territory.

I think you're misinterpreting what I am saying, in regards to the territory concessions. The Kursk invasion happened last year, before that, the West was telling Ukraine they weren't allowed to use Western made equipment on Russian territory and were pushing Ukraine away from that idea, but with the upcoming election there were very real fears that Trump would pull Ukraine's support and pressure them to freeze the conflict on the current frontlines. Freezing the conflict would have benefited Russia more than Ukraine and prior to Kursk, may have been something that Russia accepted, as they would have essentially gained 15-20% of Ukraine and been able to repair their military to try again.

If Russia accepted such a proposal but Ukraine didn't then it would give Trump his excuse to say Ukraine are being unreasonable. However, the Kursk invasion changed things, it put Russia in a position where they would absolutely not accept such a proposal because it would now mean surrendering Kursk. I don't believe it is a coincidence that Ukraine only invaded Russia right before the US Election. It was a strategic goal in more ways than one, I believe one of those goals are related to negotiations.

🇪🇺🇩🇪 10 EU states support travel restrictions on Russian "diplomats," but Germany opposes, fearing retaliation from Moscow. Due to Berlin's resistance, the EU Commission left the measure out of the 16th sanctions package set for Feb 24.

www.rmf24.pl/polityka/new...

[image or embed]

— NOELREPORTS (@noelreports.com) 6 February 2025 at 22:13

🇬🇧 The UK is expelling the Russian ambassador in response to Moscow’s actions. In late 2024, the FSB accused a British diplomat of "espionage and subversive activities"

"We will not tolerate intimidation. Any further steps from Russia will be seen as escalation," they add

www.gov.uk/government/n...

[image or embed]

— NOELREPORTS (@noelreports.com) 7 February 2025 at 10:18

Expel them all, they're all working for their Nazi Regime.

How fitting, their grunts look like Shrek and Putin is impersonating Lord Farquaad and Prince Charming for years now.