LongLiveTheBeatles said: selnor said: To be honest everyone should be used to this by now. 90% of Multiplats look better on 360. Did anyone expect otherwise? As I posted yesterday Quake wars is the same. PS3 version has no AA or HDR. 360 does.  Actually it has nothing to do with the platform and everything to do with more development time. It's an updated version of the Unreal engine. Gears 2 will be using something that looks closer to this.

 Seiner, just take the last 5, 10, 15 multi-plat games, and tell me now many look better on the 360 ;)

 

Split-screen alone makes me envy this version.
It's what I've been yearning for when I first got my hands on the game.
Though Epic did say they were also making a ps3 patch with splitscreen.

And UT3 is already above average graphically on the PS3, I'm curious to see what more they can do in the 360 version.

Mummelmann said: Jessman said: I haven't played an unreal game since the originals, they were the days.  I played the very first Unreal Torunament not finve minutes ago! It beats the hell out of every other multiplayer FPS imo, even Counterstrike!

yep original UT is loads of fun on PC. I'll add starseige tribes (modded with the addons) as my favourite though during that era of gaming.

 

None the less I still think UT is a PC game it is jsut wierd seeing console versions, hence why I got it on PC now.

TheRealMafoo said: LongLiveTheBeatles said: selnor said: To be honest everyone should be used to this by now. 90% of Multiplats look better on 360. Did anyone expect otherwise? As I posted yesterday Quake wars is the same. PS3 version has no AA or HDR. 360 does. Actually it has nothing to do with the platform and everything to do with more development time. It's an updated version of the Unreal engine. Gears 2 will be using something that looks closer to this. Seiner, just take the last 5, 10, 15 multi-plat games, and tell me now many look better on the 360 ;)

I didnt say it was the platforms fault, it's always been in the dev. It takes a good Developer to get both versions the same in the same time fram. GTA, COD4 both were equal. But the likes of AC, Quake Wars and SC4 all recently have same dev time but are reported better on 360. Of course it's devs fault, PS3 is a great machine. But my point was IF it was to go either way I'd expect nothing less usually than the 360 version looking better on multiplat.

 

well duh!

if it looked equal or worse than the PS3 version, then somethings wrong. What has it had, like a few months extra time?

selnor said: TheRealMafoo said: LongLiveTheBeatles said: selnor said: To be honest everyone should be used to this by now. 90% of Multiplats look better on 360. Did anyone expect otherwise? As I posted yesterday Quake wars is the same. PS3 version has no AA or HDR. 360 does. Actually it has nothing to do with the platform and everything to do with more development time. It's an updated version of the Unreal engine. Gears 2 will be using something that looks closer to this. Seiner, just take the last 5, 10, 15 multi-plat games, and tell me now many look better on the 360 ;)   I didnt say it was the platforms fault, it's always been in the dev. It takes a good Developer to get both versions the same in the same time fram. GTA, COD4 both were equal. But the likes of AC, Quake Wars and SC4 all recently have same dev time but are reported better on 360. Of course it's devs fault, PS3 is a great machine. But my point was IF it was to go either way I'd expect nothing less usually than the 360 version looking better on multiplat.

 GTA looks better on the PS3 from reports so far, better AA.  CoD4 in my opinion looked better on the PS3, you could see farther and things in the distance were more detailed.  But the 360 had better textures overall in CoD4, from what i saw.

starcraft said: Legend11 said: LOL, MikeB's old sig: IS there even the slightest chance he'll simply concede the power difference between the two consoles is negligible?

No, the original quote was related to Gears of War. Remember Epic / Microsoft initially claimed Gears of War couldn't be done on the PS3.

There are some Epic statements pointing out they won't tap much further into the Cell's SPEs. I always stated I think multi-platform PS3/360 games won't ever get the most out the PS3. UT3 (and I guess future Epic games) is a bad indicator of what's possible to achieve on the PS3, however it was a good indicator that Gears could be done on the PS3.

Remember that I stated in the past, that I take Epic's claims with a grain of salt on multiple occasions. 

it better look better! I wonder if the texture popping will still be there in full force.

Griffin said: selnor said: I didnt say it was the platforms fault, it's always been in the dev. It takes a good Developer to get both versions the same in the same time fram. GTA, COD4 both were equal. But the likes of AC, Quake Wars and SC4 all recently have same dev time but are reported better on 360. Of course it's devs fault, PS3 is a great machine. But my point was IF it was to go either way I'd expect nothing less usually than the 360 version looking better on multiplat.   GTA looks better on the PS3 from reports so far, better AA. CoD4 in my opinion looked better on the PS3, you could see farther and things in the distance were more detailed. But the 360 had better textures overall in CoD4, from what i saw.

Actually the same reports indicate that the 360's colour pallette is more vibrant.

 

Damn!!... I want split screen on my ps3 version...