By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is Officially Coming to Switch in 2019

Tagged games:

 

What do you think

Yes 9 28.13%
 
No 8 25.00%
 
I will wait for the review 6 18.75%
 
I dont care for graphic ,... 3 9.38%
 
I already have the games ... 6 18.75%
 
Total:32
HollyGamer on 12 June 2019
Vodacixi said:
HollyGamer said:

https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/nintendo-switch-battery-life-2949802

So... now you shoot your own foot? You went from 2 or 1 and a half ours on your first "source"... to 2 hours 45 minutes with max bright and 3 hours and 15 minutes with less bright and airplane mode on your second source.

Well, it's a start for you I guess xD

I did said 2 hours but i did not said the detail, it could be more it could be less, so my point is still correct, Switch batteries istill about 2 hours, it could be 2 and half or more or even 2 hours depend on the games , condition and the volume setting and brightness setting, wifi on of, and etc etc.  



Around the Network
HollyGamer on 12 June 2019
HoangNhatAnh said:
HollyGamer said:

unplayable = hard to enjoy . Or perhaps you love ARK port on Switch

Enjoyable is different than playable though

By words it's different, but a games that is not enjoyable could also be read as unplayable to some. For me if i am making a Youtube video to a lot of viewers  i will be more savely choosing my words to not insult some viewers and readers. Digital foundry words is just choosing different words.

Also the video also explained latter on  how the games will be unstable and hard to maintain frame rates , if this does not show how bad the performance test is i don't know how to explain to you anymore. 

And then you mention the games can be playable at 20 to 25 fps. I guess playable in your opinion is different from playable in Digital foundry opinion and mind, games like ARK survival evolved sitting at the same frame rates and resolution that you mentioned and many people complain is unplayable, but i guess your standard is different. 

We can agree and not agree. But i do respect your standard, if you can enjoy games in 20 to 25 fps , than you may have right to claim is playable. 



DonFerrari on 12 June 2019
Green098 said:

It could have held up worse, the real news is that all 32gb will on the cart.

Seems like they have screen capture of the gameplay sections on open area looking very bad and last gen mixed with capture of cutscenes that look like this gen.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari on 12 June 2019
HollyGamer said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

Enjoyable is different than playable though

By words it's different, but a games that is not enjoyable could also be read as unplayable to some. For me if i am making a Youtube video to a lot of viewers  i will be more savely choosing my words to not insult some viewers and readers. Digital foundry words is just choosing different words.

Also the video also explained latter on  how the games will be unstable and hard to maintain frame rates , if this does not show how bad the performance test is i don't know how to explain to you anymore. 

And then you mention the games can be playable at 20 to 25 fps. I guess playable in your opinion is different from playable in Digital foundry opinion and mind, games like ARK survival evolved sitting at the same frame rates and resolution that you mentioned and many people complain is unplayable, but i guess your standard is different. 

We can agree and not agree. But i do respect your standard, if you can enjoy games in 20 to 25 fps , than you may have right to claim is playable. 

The funny thing is how on VGC Nintendo fans are very adept of the 60fps and gameplay over graphics and bashing sony exclusives for being cinematic, 30fps, etc, etc, etc. But for Witcher 3 20fps will be good.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

HollyGamer on 12 June 2019
DonFerrari said:
HollyGamer said:

By words it's different, but a games that is not enjoyable could also be read as unplayable to some. For me if i am making a Youtube video to a lot of viewers  i will be more savely choosing my words to not insult some viewers and readers. Digital foundry words is just choosing different words.

Also the video also explained latter on  how the games will be unstable and hard to maintain frame rates , if this does not show how bad the performance test is i don't know how to explain to you anymore. 

And then you mention the games can be playable at 20 to 25 fps. I guess playable in your opinion is different from playable in Digital foundry opinion and mind, games like ARK survival evolved sitting at the same frame rates and resolution that you mentioned and many people complain is unplayable, but i guess your standard is different. 

We can agree and not agree. But i do respect your standard, if you can enjoy games in 20 to 25 fps , than you may have right to claim is playable. 

The funny thing is how on VGC Nintendo fans are very adept of the 60fps and gameplay over graphics and bashing sony exclusives for being cinematic, 30fps, etc, etc, etc. But for Witcher 3 20fps will be good.

Probably not all Nintendo fans, some of them .  But I can see why they are defending the consoles and so militant about their favorite device.