ConservagameR said:
Ok, but no doubt the anti abortion reply to that would be there was always a choice not to partake in procreation. That doesn't take everything into account though, like rape, but that would get a blind eye turned to it, like those who were for strict mandates and didn't care about people's choice. What I don't get is why both sides don't just make their own rules where they reside for the most part, and leave the Federal Government out of forcing everyone to either accept or reject it. Why not give options since both sides can't seem to find a middle ground? |
Wow. Your point was completely blown out of the water, and you pivoted to complete nonsense. If someone chooses to have sex, that does not mean they lose the choice of anything that happens afterwards.
As for why each side can't just make up their own rules, because that's not how human rights fucking work. It's the same reason a state can't say you have to get a vaccine or you can't work anywhere. Because a) a person should not be forced to uproot their lives to exercise their basic human rights and b) not everyone is always able to leave a particular place.
Last edited by JWeinCom - on 11 May 2022