By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - $130 will match or beat any console in terms of graphical fidelity.

This thread was actually for the benifit of people with older pcs to show them what they could buy nowadays.. LOL.

One of the drawcards of pcs is a higher resolutution/fidelity graphics system. I only compared because consoles are a known quantity, so its easier to understand relative next to a set standard.



Tease.

Around the Network

Ah. Here we go:

http://web.archive.org/web/20051107091702/http://www.tigerdirect.com/

Tigerdirect.com's special of the week:

AMD 64 3400
512mb DDR Memory
200GB HDD
Unknown GPU
$449.99 - No monitor.

Could that run World in Conflict? Although we don't know GPU specs from that article, I'd say at best case, a rig like that would run WIC absolutely, positively bare minimum.

If anyone can find other relevant PC specs for $450-$700 systems from the X360's debut, I'd love to see it.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

Sqrl said:

@ion-storm,

If you want to run full everything then get a gaming rig, because consoles don't run full everything. They just lock you into settings that the console can handle, and in pretty much every case they lock you in at settings lower than absolute max.



Consoles do full everything that they can do :) I can't buy a more expensive PS3 to make the settings on the game higher. Having a game capable of looking better but you can't because your pc isn't good enough sucks. Medium and low may as well be called Fail and Epic Fail. Sure medium may look better than PS3 power sometime but hey, I'm aware my ideas on the subject are strange.

Also I have yet to find a pc gaming rig with the same 4 player split screen action as a console. But maybe that's because I haven't looked hard enough.



Yes

ion-storm said:
Sqrl said:

@ion-storm,

If you want to run full everything then get a gaming rig, because consoles don't run full everything. They just lock you into settings that the console can handle, and in pretty much every case they lock you in at settings lower than absolute max.



Consoles do full everything that they can do :) I can't buy a more expensive PS3 to make the settings on the game higher. Having a game capable of looking better but you can't because your pc isn't good enough sucks. Medium and low may as well be called Fail and Epic Fail. Sure medium may look better than PS3 power sometime but hey, I'm aware my ideas on the subject are strange.

Also I have yet to find a pc gaming rig with the same 4 player split screen action as a console. But maybe that's because I haven't looked hard enough.

You're happy that PS3 can't be upgraded? I thought that was actually an disadvantage since there are people who would be glad to pay $50/$100 to upgrade their console and make games look better and play smoother, instead of playing games that have minimum resolution compared to PC games (COD4's 600p anyone?!)

You're just jealous of people who play with better settings and setups (aka. PC gamers).



mrstickball said:
Ah. Here we go:

http://web.archive.org/web/20051107091702/http://www.tigerdirect.com/

Tigerdirect.com's special of the week:

AMD 64 3400
512mb DDR Memory
200GB HDD
Unknown GPU
$449.99 - No monitor.

Could that run World in Conflict? Although we don't know GPU specs from that article, I'd say at best case, a rig like that would run WIC absolutely, positively bare minimum.

If anyone can find other relevant PC specs for $450-$700 systems from the X360's debut, I'd love to see it.

$500 1900xt - is faster than the Xbox360s GPU, release date - January 2006 The rest is a standard computer, since we're not adding the cost of HD screens etc... The rest is standard computer fare. You need it anyway so why count it? A decent user will have a gig of ram and adequate cpu anyway. If you want you can add a bit for ram and PSU, maybe another $100?

Tease.

Around the Network

@Sqrl
He said Crysis on the LOWEST settings :), Go do that, and tell me what you think. I just did. Everything on low, and a rez of 800x480 (the lowest posable setting).

Now go play Black for the PS2, and tell me what you think.
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/9491.html

While I will admit Crysis does end up looking better then this 2 year old game running on 32 meg of ram, it doesn't look that much better.

Just imagine what they will be able to do in 4 years with 16 times that amount of memory, and a processor like the Cell ;)




@sgrl

"A 500W PSU is plenty for a rig with a 9600GT, I have been building systems for a long time, I think I know what I'm doing. As for adding in the cost of all nice keyboards and headsets: Ok fine, now add the cost of 3 extra controllers for the console and the headset as well. This works both ways, lets not play that silly game."

I never said anything about a 9600gt, i said dual 8800GTX's with 3-4GB of ram, with a quadcore. Why would the console need 3extra controllers, can 4 people play on your mouse and keyboard, and the 360 comes with a great headset

Random Person B said:
kingofwale said:
let's be serious here. Buying a console will guarantee you to have at least 5+ years of playing the newest game on that console.

Can you say that to a PC that costs around the same price?

That is why console sales are up, while PC gaming are down.

Thats a pretty ignorant statement. When the PS3 came out at 600 bucks, I could easily make a 5+ year gaming computer not counting the monitor with that amount. Great thing about the computer is that virtually all software made on it scales. Crysis on medium is still technically better than anything you got on consoles.

Furthermore, if your smart you wouldnt spend the same amount of money on a computer as a PS3. In general the better computer you get now, the more money you'll save for not having to upgrade later down the line. So if you're serious about making a gaming PC, then yes, your computer will be guaranteed to play all the newest games.

Also, PC gaming industry is going up, or have you not been paying attention at all.


Ya I built a 3500 amd with a 7600 gt super clock for around $ 500.00 a year and a half ago and I could play crysis and cod4 on it but it looks like crap  adding a &130.00 graphics card or even a $200.00 card would still be slow because of the cpu needs a total upgrade to run crysis right!

 6600 quad core' 8800 gt would get you decent results still crysis might look better on medium  then on a console but still wouldnt be all you can be with out a serious upgrade.

And there's no Graphics card from 5 years ago that could handle any games today besides the cpu and the system memmory please tell me your kidding?????



Sqrl said:

@TheRealMafoo,

Glad we agree on most points, as for the one we don't agree on if you take a look at the example of Shio's brother you'll see what I mean. One of my friends just recently upgraded his PC from the exact same video card Shio's bro has actually. It easily played pretty much any valve game, Bioshock, etc..Its not the best place to be as a PC gamer but you can make it work while you save up for 6 months to replace some stuff, which is exactly what he did. My brother is still happily gaming on a 3 year old PC and I asked him this past weekend when he was in town if he thought he might need an upgrade soon and he didn't think he needed it at all.

@Rainbird,

I think you missed the point. I'm not advocating PC over console. I'm saying that people need a PC in todays world anyways. Since the cost of making your standard PC into a gaming rig is cheaper than the consoles it just makes sense to do it if you actually want to play PC games.

At your points specifically, Crytek has stated they think they can run at High but they haven't stated what at what resolution. 1080p is ~2m pixels, 720p is only about 920k pixels. Thats a big difference in performance right there. The resolution I play on with a mixture of high and X-High settings is about 1.75M pixels. It really depends on what resolution they get high settings running on that determines how impressive a job they've done.

On the point of outdated hardware, consoles become outdated just as fast (if not faster than PCs). This is definitely mitigated by software designed for the platform but the PC has the option of incremental upgrades where the console does not.

On the subject of games, I won't argue which has the coolest games since it is subjective. But I will go back to my point that if you don't want to play the PC games then you shouldn't pay the extra cash. But if you do then you should..thats a simple concept that anyone should be able to grasp.

 

@ MrStick,

I have to agree with Shio that your experience with the PC market is a bit outdated, the market has changed significantly and prices are still moving towards the cheaper side of things meaning in 2-3 years it might even be better than it is now.

@griffin,

A 500W PSU is plenty for a rig with a 9600GT, I have been building systems for a long time, I think I know what I'm doing. As for adding in the cost of all nice keyboards and headsets: Ok fine, now add the cost of 3 extra controllers for the console and the headset as well. This works both ways, lets not play that silly game.

@therepublic,

No that really isn't a problem for the argument, if you buy a pre-built you're already paying for them to build it so you could just as easily call a local PC shop and have them build it if you're not comfortable with it. As for your last line I think it fits perfectly with what I said originally, one of the reasons I listed for not making their PC a gaming rig was ignorance, and your statement there is talking about people without basic knowledge.

@realmafoo,

Crysis on low is PS2? Really?

Here is a few comparison shots (56k Warning, they are big images): One, Two, Three

I need to go back and play my PS2 again, the graphics must've been way better than I thought

@ion-storm,

If you want to run full everything then get a gaming rig, because consoles don't run full everything. They just lock you into settings that the console can handle, and in pretty much every case they lock you in at settings lower than absolute max.

@final-fan,

Repeating this for those who can't read our PMs: You can also buy a gaming rig from the crazy 3Dmark/enthusiast crowd who upgrades constantly. So if you are ok with buying a used PC in the first place you can go straight for the kill so to speak.

As for upgrades, what kind of upgrades are you expecting to need? New OS when Vienna comes out? Typical PC owners will face the same thing so its not really an additional cost just because you game. Upgrade memory? 2GB is $40 right now, in 2-3 years? Much less. As shio and I have pointed out a PCs built in 2003-04 are still running games, just not at the greatest settings. Even then I think there is a fair argument to be made in the fact that PC games cost less and money saved there helps pay for any upgrades needed. I've already saved probably $150 this generation from being able to buy the PC version of games instead of the 360 versions. Bioshock($10), Assassins Creed($15), CoD4($10), Orange Box($15), SS:Double Agent($10), Oblivion($10), thats off the top of my head anyways.

In terms of showing you a PC that runs CoD4 for under $279, no problem. I take your non gaming rig and add $260 in parts and then you have a gaming rig that can play CoD4 at better resolutions and settings than the consoles. But if you want to sit on your couch and play it just get the console version. This single game scenarios are sort of silly when each of us can say show me a console/PC that can play (exclusive game).

@Untamoi,

Considering just about everyone has those things already I can forget them. Otherwise lets start including the HDTV price in the cost of a console..now consoles are far more expensive..but the fact that a TV is used for other things is a valid argument for the TV..but somehow not the typical PC?

edit: Also I'd bet more people have a PC monitor than have HDTVs.  So if you want that included then I'm all for it. It makes this very cut and dry.

 


also console gaming can be done on a couch reclining priceless! Sitting at a chair with mouse and keyboard 22 1/2 inchs from 19 inch screen painful! PC gaming is work console gaming is relaxing! 

I mean God you go to work all day come home and jump on a PC ????? I guess hotpockets and a good chair and some monster go along way ???

and any one playing a pc 3 years old without an upgrade is playing WOW or GW or some weak arse video game with graphics on crap mode not enjoying all the latest and diffinetly not living with current gen console graphics.

 

PS your argument that things will be cheaper only holds true if Intel and AMD dont change design like Intel did with rambus and Memmory sky rocketed and ultimitly failed so technology changes and prices are subject to that to look at gas prices its getting worse? the console techs the same through the life and a pc might not be compatible in 3 years AGP ,PCI express you know the difference so things on the pc world can and do become obsolete quick.

its the constant upgrading to play the latest game with all the bells and whistles. its a never ending cycle yes the 360 has problem but a 3 year warranty is pretty good insurance.



@mrstickball,

Like I said I don't agree with the premise of the thread, my point is that you will buy a PC anyways and the cost to go from the PC you would buy anyways to the PC you would game on is less than the current cost of a Wii.   

@ion-storm,

So you like consoles because they give you the warm fuzzy feeling that nobody else who has that platform has one better than yours?  Kinda silly, imo, but whatever bakes your cake man.  Either way its still a personal preference and not really relavent to others.

@TheRealMafoo,

Now you're just being obstinate. The original point was not that Shio's bro had to play it on the absolute minimum of minimums but that features were on the "Low" settings.  He was probably playing 1024x768 or 1280x960 etc..which at those resolutions the game still looks pretty damn good on both of those settings on my monitor, and considering how stretched that was on a 22" monitor that says a lot.

@Griffin,

Your exact quote was:

"Also a 450-500 Power supply won't be enough for a good gaming rig."

The $650 PC with an e8200 and 9600GT is more than just a good gaming rig and a 500W PSU is more than sufficient for it.

@Daddo,

Almost everything you've said has been brought up and responded to in this thread already by me.  I'm not going to waste my time responding to each person who can't be bothered to read the thread on their own. 

And for the record your "my opinion is an argument" shtick in the first two paragraphs can take a hike.  I don't assess your opinions when selecting my gaming platforms and you don't assess mine when selecting yours, so lets go ahead and skip those arguments, k? k~ 

 



To Each Man, Responsibility