By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What kind of world would it be if these events didn't take place

The_vagabond7 on 13 April 2008
El Duderino said:
Every time I kill someone I tell myself "That probaby was going to be the next Hitler."
 I think the exact same thing every time I throw my condom away. 

 



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

Around the Network
El Duderino on 13 April 2008
The_vagabond7 said:
El Duderino said:
Every time I kill someone I tell myself "That probaby was going to be the next Hitler."
I think the exact same thing every time I throw my condom away.

 


 You don´t seem to have much faith in the fruit of your loins... at least you would be the father of they guy who conquerd half of the world... you might get your own country...



 

 

 

The_vagabond7 on 13 April 2008

I fear my offspring, if it conquered half the world (and it would by age 12) I don't think I'd get my own country, if I'm lucky I'd get a holiday dedicated to the day he had me decapitated. My genes are too damn good, and usually I burn my used condoms just to make sure none of those damn little guys crawl out and kill me in my sleep then sex with my wife.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

Flow on 13 April 2008
cool48 said:
Flow said:
Seriously, i think these kind of things can't even be imaginated.

Imagine that world war 2 triggered (or prevented from be triggered) an event that could change everything, like killed some pacifist that would bring world peace (yeah of course), some diplomat that would bring peace into africa or some crazy bastard worse than hitler that would destroy the entire world. Or even killed some normal guy that would influence the life of someone else making this guy important.

Wow that was strange

Nice


 Phear ma englishe.




Flow -"The important is to pwn other ppl"

HappySqurriel on 13 April 2008
segajon said:
how has gore misrepresented anything on cimate change

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/10/11/scigore111.xml
Al Gore's environmental documentary An Inconvenient Truth contains nine key scientific errors, a High Court judge ruled yesterday.

  
The judge declined to ban the Academy Award-winning film from British schools, but ruled that it can only be shown with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.

In the documentary, directed by Davis Guggenheim, the former US vice president and environmental activist calls on people to fight global warming because "humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb".

But Judge Michael Burton ruled yesterday that errors had arisen "in the context of alarmism and exaggeration" in order to support Mr Gore's thesis on global warming

The 9 scientific errors were the only ones which could be (conclusively) demonstrated to be false (or exagerated), there are dozens of claims in that movie where the science is disputed, and even more claims where the existing data does not (fully) support the conclusion being made. In other words, the movie is a misrepresentation of science for the purpose of putting you into a panic.



Around the Network
CaptainPrefrences on 14 April 2008
Parokki said:
If Africans hadn't used so much slavery, then they probably wouldn't have sold their surplus slaves to Europeans, and there would be fewer black people in the Americas. zomg!

The ridiculous amount of nonsense threads you've been posting lately has forced me to disable Off Topic threads from my front page view. I hope you're happy with yourself.

 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=__lCEXgFxfU&feature=related