By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which Game do you believe will have the Best Graphics for 2008?

Is it just me, or does anyone else think that 'Art Direction' is a cheap way of saying 'System X is not as strong as System Y, and the games aren't even close to one another graphically, but as an artist, this games looks excellent'.

It reminds me of comparing a pretty girl/boy to an ugly girl/boy and instead of someone being ashamed of being with an ugly person [which they should (sorry I'm so shallow)], they point out personality. It's just a cop-out. Graphics are graphics. The thread is graphically, the best game of 2008, but somehow, we got into art-direction.

/rant.



Around the Network
DMeisterJ said:
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that 'Art Direction' is a cheap way of saying 'System X is not as strong as System Y, and the games aren't even close to one another graphically, but as an artist, this games looks excellent'.

It reminds me of comparing a pretty girl/boy to an ugly girl/boy and instead of someone being ashamed of being with an ugly person [which they should (sorry I'm so shallow)], they point out personality. It's just a cop-out. Graphics are graphics. The thread is graphically, the best game of 2008, but somehow, we got into art-direction.

/rant.

That is just not true. It is very possible for a game to be technically more impressive but less pleasing to the eye. The uncanny valley has yet to be jumped, and it likely won't happen within this generation of consoles. The most technically detailed human models will look the worst as a result. Animations, and atmosphere also play a big part in it.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Some PC game.



DMeisterJ said:
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that 'Art Direction' is a cheap way of saying 'System X is not as strong as System Y, and the games aren't even close to one another graphically, but as an artist, this games looks excellent'.

It reminds me of comparing a pretty girl/boy to an ugly girl/boy and instead of someone being ashamed of being with an ugly person [which they should (sorry I'm so shallow)], they point out personality. It's just a cop-out. Graphics are graphics. The thread is graphically, the best game of 2008, but somehow, we got into art-direction.

/rant.

Is it just me or does anyone else think that assuming that graphics only means what looks the most real is not only shallow but narrow as well, considering that graphics are made up of not only quality but originality, artistic style, and how the image reflects the story, setting, and general message of the game.

It reminds me of people who say beauty is only what's on the outside however your only as beautiful as your character.  You can put a dress on a pig and stuff it with makeup, but its still a disgusting pig.  It's really just the truth.  Graphics are good because they fit the game and they are original.  This is why Okami is easily had the greatest graphics in recent years because it was original, polished, and fit the game beautifully.  It didn't dress up a pig to look great even though on the inside it was terrible.  It complemented a beatiful game with one of the greatest graphical achievements in video games.  Alot better than the gritty overused washed out pallet of most "realistic" games today.

/owned



If we are just talking consoles, it is bound to be a PS3 exclusive game. Otherwise, several games on PC will likely be better than any of the games you mentioned.



 

Tired of big government?
Want liberty in your lifetime?
Join us @
http://www.freestateproject.org

Around the Network
starcraft said:
CaptainPrefrences said:
because you just had to brag about how good the 360 games gameplay is in a thread about graphics


I don't think I said anything about any 360 game's gameplay.  But I agree with your point about how good 360 game's gameplay is.

In fact, I didn't even specify which game with a poor gameplay history I was referring too.  Funny that you assumed it was a PS3 game........... 


The OP only listed PS3 games (besides GOW), and you said how you were worried about how at least 1 of the games he listed would have poor gameplay. You do the math.



Aj_habfan said:
starcraft said:
CaptainPrefrences said:
because you just had to brag about how good the 360 games gameplay is in a thread about graphics


I don't think I said anything about any 360 game's gameplay. But I agree with your point about how good 360 game's gameplay is.

In fact, I didn't even specify which game with a poor gameplay history I was referring too. Funny that you assumed it was a PS3 game...........


The OP only listed PS3 games (besides GOW), and you said how you were worried about how at least 1 of the games he listed would have poor gameplay. You do the math.

In the same post that he is para-phrasing from, I spoke about 360 games.  I never specified one way or another.  Even if I had, it was hardly a thread derailing comment, until the Captain and the rest of the SDF raced in here, ignored the rest of my post and concentrated on that.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Art direction should not be taken into account. This is because it cannot be debated. It is completely subjective. I believe art direction is just as important as having technically good graphics, but art direction can't be debated, where as graphics from a technical stand point can.

@Starcraft, nice flamebait/trolling.



tombi123 said:
Art direction should not be taken into account. This is because it cannot be debated. It is completely subjective. I believe art direction is just as important as having technically good graphics, but art direction can't be debated, where as graphics from a technical stand point can.

@Starcraft, nice flamebait/trolling.
Lol, whatever mate.  I directly answered the OP and posed another issue for discussion.  It was the SDF, not me, that seemed to feel a discussion about "gameplay" threatened the PS3's reputation.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

starcraft is it physically impossible for you to admit you're wrong?