By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Is the PSP considered successful for Sony?

Final-Fan said:
Sky Render said:
In business, the ultimate goal is to make a profit. In that regard, it doesn't matter if you sell only 1 unit, as long as you get a return off of it; that's still better than selling 30 million and taking a loss. Which is a part of why Sony and Microsoft's business models are so very scorned by businesses at large. To sell something at a loss in hopes of making up for that loss in the future is something that only a firm with a lot of capital to spare can risk. And is the PSP profitable yet? Has it made up for the losses it incurred early on? I haven't seen any reports stating such, but I would be interested in seeing them.
I didn't realize that Sony took such massive losses on the PSP. I mean it's turning a profit now, and has been for some time, right? Do you know what the initial loss rate was? Do you know when it went from loss to gain? Does ANYONE know what the gain rate is now?

 That's what I'd like to find out.  Sony most certainly was taking a loss on the PSP initially; I think the original reports said they were losing around $50 or $100 per system sold, though I can't recall exactly where those reports came from now (it was a good 3 or so years ago, after all).  If anybody finds the reports on the initial losses of the PSP, as well as any reports on how the PSP's been doing lately on cost vs. revenue, it'd be very much appreciated if you'd post it here.



Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.

Around the Network

I think the PSP isn't doing as succesful as Sony would have hoped, but considering the behemoth that is DS, the PSP is doing great. No other handheld has ever done so well against Nintendo's.

That being said, a lot of things have to change for the PSP2 for it to be succesful. Most third parties will not develop for the PSP2 if things will go as they are going now.



You're like the Sony version of sc94579, not something you should strive for.

In response to the original post, yes it has been and is a success, Sony makes money off of it, and moves 150,000 a week, why would it not be considered a success?



username

what is up with you calling me a troll on sony?

i have a friken ps3/ps2 and i love them!



I'm not calling you a troll.... Just asking why the PSP wouldn't be considered a success.



Around the Network
eab said:
It was a terrible failure. I look at the larger picture.

2002: Sony dominated console gaming, Nintendo was getting annihilated in sales and was loosing ground everywhere. All Nintendo really had left was handhelds, the same market they had held for the past 20 years. Sony, not comfortable with simply taking over all of Nintendo's former console market got greedy and wanted more. They wanted that hand held market and really intended to decimate Nintendo's last stand.

2003: Sony announces the PSP with the backing of dozens of studios and millions of R&D poured in. Internet forums everywhere sing of Nintendo's imminent doom. Nintendo gets worried, realizes it can't win in a head to head fight of graphics. Nintendo, now backed into a corner and faced with the real danger of loosing their last market, they turn to their engineers and innovate. The DS idea is created, Nintendo hopes for the best.

2005 It is clear now that the DS is favored over the PSP, Nintendo realizes the Blue Ocean strategy and applies it to consoles. Wii idea created. Wii destroys PS3 sales just as the DS destroyed PSP sales.

Summary: If Sony never got greedy and tried to overpower Nintendo's last stand, Nintendo probably would have never been forced to innovate as much with the DS. Even if Nintendo had made the DS without Sony's pressure, they would never have known how well it could do against an overpowered rival system. Without that knowledge, the concept of the weaker Wii beating the PS3 would not have been thought up really.
Sony's decision to make a PSP didn't take out Nintendo's last stand like they hoped, it instead indirectly killed the PS3. I say the PSP was a terrible failure.

That is an interesting theory. Completely innaccurate gibberish but interesting none the less. The Wii was announced in 2004, and planning of it started in 2001. Your theory is hurt further by the fact that Miyamoto has gone on record as saying if the DS had flopper the Wii would have needed a redesign.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

i dont considrr the psp a success because of the crappy software and its easy hackable firmware, but mainly software.

most peopel i see use it as a music player



Well its not meant to be a gameboy, its multimedia on the go, the freedom to do what you want when you want, and its good at that.

How is having hackable Firmware make it a failure, it gives you even more freedom to do what you want with it, it has its games, it has movies, it has music, it has internet capabilities.

But hey, some people are just biased.



Username:
Hackable firmware makes it good for the consumers. Consumers!=Sony. You think that Sony considers it successful because it's hacked all over the place and people are downloading millions of illegal games instead of buying them legitimately? We have a word for that: fanboy.

If it was meant to be multimedia on the go, why would it appear at E3 and be called Playstation, which is a videogame brand?



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."

no username

hackable firmware = very poor software sales.

thats where the psp phails epically