Yep. For me HR, B2S and probably Detroit is between 80-90 game perhaps even higher. I really enjoyed the first 2.

Seems like you ignored your own point on how all reviewers are professional.

And sorry to burst your bubble, but games should be evaluated on what they try to accomplish and not on what you would like them to be. 

And seems like the 2 reviewers that gave GT5 40 and 50 got decomissioned.

But sure, a 40 on a 80 average is impossible to be a troll.

So you admit to be fishing using a strawman argument? Where did anyone besides you said any score that is far from average (that for you if 25 or 40 is the same, then 25 to 10 is the same and 10 to 0 as well right?) is troll (you are also the only one talking about fake review). You are the one changing definitions non-stop to try and make an argument stick, and have failed miserably at it.

When you read the review for GTS and see how it is fake you come and use it. Because people here have read the Detroit and show why it's ridiculous.

Are we discussing Angry Joe? Haven't seem his review cited here. And still Detroit wouldn't dwell on below average (also ignore that gaming average have been sitting about 70 as also show to you in other threads).

No problem you watching Jim, just curious why you would watch negative reviews on a game you don't care on a platform you never play. Will you list the PS games you played yet?

That's what happen if you can't maintain professionalism you get decommissioned. 

I'm not saying they are all professional most of the review writers are young college kids with very little experience.... but the Metascore make their review irrelevant. 

Going back to Detroit: Become Human of the 84 reviews most are from credible source and websites. If someone did not enjoy the game and use a 5 point scale .... 2/5 (40%) isn't trolling it's just a negative review.   Reviewer backed up his score with an article that explain why he din't like it. 80 average isn't there because all reviews should be 80%, it's what the game got from compiling all review score. 

I agree but there has been nothing that hasn't been recycled or a mishmash of the same stuff since the 70's. It's all the same stuff done differently even games like SOMA or Neir Automata are just varied versions of the same material,same goes for all movies and TV since.

The game doesn't have to say something new to be good, I believe it fell short trying to achieve to much not because it didn't try and reinvent the autonomous wheel.

It has nothing to do with an emotional attachment. Just common sense. And I'm playing the game. A 4/10 is absolutely ludicrous and it seems that most sensible reviewers agree. :)

Thanks for backtracking.

Not liking a game isn't the main metric for any score. He is reviewing a game not scoring his enjoyment. Unless you find it acceptable if I would score Halo a 0 because I totally don't like the game.

Heavy rain is a good game but I think Beyond two souls is still one of the dumbest games I´ve ever played. Just cant get over it it feels like he just made everything up as he went on. Heavy rain is good and Indigo Prophecy is pretty fun aswell. 

That's what happen if you can't maintain professionalism you get decommissioned. 

I'm not saying they are all professional most of the review writers are young college kids with very little experience.... but the Metascore make their review irrelevant. 

Going back to Detroit: Become Human of the 84 reviews most are from credible source and websites. If someone did not enjoy the game and use a 5 point scale .... 2/5 (40%) isn't trolling it's just a negative review.   Reviewer backed up his score with an article that explain why he din't like it. 80 average isn't there because all reviews should be 80%, it's what the game got from compiling all review score. 

He already told you.  There are plenty of people who watch a reviewer's videos (myself included, which is why I'm throwing my 2 cents in here) regardless of what they are playing, because they happen to like the reviewer.  I watched the exact same video, and I have no problem telling you that I don't have a PS4.  I didn't type "find negative reviews on Detroit: Become Human" into the YouTube search bar.  I typed "Jim Sterling", because I happen to like listening to his videos while on lunch break or driving home from work.  If you like the particular reviewer, the content doesn't have to be something you actually intend to play, or sought out, or even agree with for that matter.

Played through the game in a week and I'd say 79 is a pretty fair meta score. I'd personally give it the game a 7. And like other story driven games, I'm not keen to replay it anytime soon - hence why I traded it in.

[MINI REVIEW] My verdict.. better than Beyond, by far but not quite as good as Heavy Rain. Which is a bit of a disappointment as I am fascinated at the premise and setting of the game. Detroit does have a good cast with some of my favourite actors in it; Clancy Brown, Lance Henriksen, anyone? And some of the best looking graphics I've seen in-game.

Negatives, the game has clunky controls and awkward QTE's that have you wrestling around with your controller like a madman/woman else your characters suffer an ill fate should you miss to hit the right command. Story despite a promising start falls flat and a lot of cringy dialogue and text.

It does have some excellent moments in the game that pull on your heartstrings and a lot of options for replayability. Sadly, it is let down by the story, dull characters (barring Connor, Hank and a few others) and some poor writing.

I didn't find it dumb, but it done it's job on what it was supposed to do, so no reason for a low score as well.

Thanks for backtracking.

Not liking a game isn't the main metric for any score. He is reviewing a game not scoring his enjoyment. Unless you find it acceptable if I would score Halo a 0 because I totally don't like the game.

Well I am someone that even if I like the person or format of what they do just watch if the content itself holds some interest to me. Otherwise it bores me.

I 'won't go any further because you probably missed the mod warning. Anyway I have no issue with you not having a PS4 or playing its exclusives (or even being in a thread about one), as long as you are clear on it everything is fine.