By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mcube said:
DonFerrari said:

I didn't find it dumb, but it done it's job on what it was supposed to do, so no reason for a low score as well.

Thanks for backtracking.

Not liking a game isn't the main metric for any score. He is reviewing a game not scoring his enjoyment. Unless you find it acceptable if I would score Halo a 0 because I totally don't like the game.

Well I am someone that even if I like the person or format of what they do just watch if the content itself holds some interest to me. Otherwise it bores me.

I 'won't go any further because you probably missed the mod warning. Anyway I have no issue with you not having a PS4 or playing its exclusives (or even being in a thread about one), as long as you are clear on it everything is fine.

What do you mean it did what it was supposed to do? Its easy to say it like that since Aliens Colonial Marines and Duke Nukem Forever both also did what they were supposed to do. Beyond was such a confusing trainwreck its spectacular in how dumb it is. Everything Beyond did Heavy Rain did better I mean this is shown in reviews and public opinions on both games just brushing it off as ´it did what it had to do´ sounds like it was sucessfull in what it did which, let´s be fair here, wasn´t really the case.  

Quantic Dream games are supposed to be a narrative driven game with simple commands to interact and decide.

It's supposed to convey emotion heavy experience.

It's supposed to have great graphics and good face models.

Best metric in this case is seeing how the people that is their core market are very favorable of it.

To me HR and B2S were sucesfull in achieving what I expected. Will play Detroit to see as well.

Aliens CM and Duke NF were both trash level.

Should we keep remembering you that Detroit is 80 average so the low scores are really showing to be out of place? While ACM and DNF are very badly regarded and reviewed even on average. Totally exaggeration fallacy attempt.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."