Do they have a persona aganda against Sony or something?
How are such people credible reviewers? or given copies of games, if they systematically appear to do so?
Sony doesn't send him review copies of their games. And I don't know about other publishers. Thats primarily why his reviews usually come weeks or months after a game is released.
Its truly unfortunate his reviews are allowed to taaintthe metacritic pool simply because hes a backer though. His scoring is just too consistently bad that its impossible to say there isn't an agenda or bias. Especially when you actually see the stuff he scores highly. MGS4 a 40? Halo a 2/10????
Like really? And his reviews just track opposite from whatever the general concensus is..... just look at his review history on metacritic