Sony has recently said that despite the fact that they have been selling extraordinary amount of consoles this holiday they cannot ignore Nintendo's switch.  Nintendo Switch is truly a very unique and intriguing concept,  if Sony were to challenge Nintendo and released their own version of the Switch would it fail just like the Vita did. Or perhaps they can learn from their mistakes and really try to push the PS Switch with strong 3rd party support.   What do you think is required of Sony to make a successful version of the Switch?   more powerful?  better online? cheaper price ? 

Bold.

Bold.

If western gamers only want to play on the big screen, why are Switch sales so high in NA? AAA may not concern you, but based on your past posts, it most certainly matters to everyone else who you speak for apparently. Many AAA games are on Switch? How many? Why so many if the devs/pubs don't care and it doesn't matter and Switch customers don't want them anyway? What's the difference with physical other than the few who like the box collection or premium edition? How is it any different whether Nin loads the game onto the cart at the factory vs the user loading the game onto a card in the device? You mentioned both third party and western AAA. How many specific western AAA games does Nin make? Doesn't Doom have multiplayer? X1 in Switch is not custom, and is simply underclocked when in handheld mode. You said X3 is Xavier, and that they could do it with Xavier, yet it's 30w. Switch 2 would have little choice but to use X2, or another chip that doesn't even exist yet, and you've made it clear that guessing and making up a random idea to fit a claim isn't a valid argument so. Nin and PS systems used to always use highly custom hardware, where as now they only are using semi-custom, if not bone stock. Nin also used hardware that can potentially lead to generational upgrades, as per Nvidia CEO and their 10-20 year outlook, which is unlike Nin, and PS also gave up their all in one device goal they have been going for since they added CD to PS1, DVD to PS2, and BD to PS3. Both Switch and PS4 are fairly safe devices for both companies and don't exactly follow their typical path, so assuming PS will make the portable so it's graphics are so hardcore that the portable would only have a few hours battery life doesn't make much sense. The PS portable would at least match the Switch around 3 hours min for it's most demanding games, at whatever downgraded level they ended up at. Not to mention the battery accessories like Switch has available to it that can double the battery life, which would surely be made for the PS portable as well.

Over 85% mean not all and New 3ds take at least 2 year to Nintendo put SNES VC on it. I don't said fact but it is not wise to spend too much time to figure out and optimize SNES VC on 3DS while on New 3DS it is much simple and faster, they also need to advertise New 3DS ability so it is good business choice. Also, some games won't ever happen if Nintendo only have 3ds like Minecraft this year, look at Hyrule Warriors Legend 3ds vs New 3ds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2J98CvVau4

One question: Do you think psp can run emulator all GBA games? Yes or no?

The Vita didn't fail. What Sony needs to do is advertise more like Nintendo and explain what the products can do. They need the viral commercials showing you playing a game on the Playstation and grabbing your portable to continue the game on the go etc. I would much prefer a PSP style portable over a Switch and I have no desire to dock it to my TV. Make every game work on both platforms when purchased and you have a winner. I however still want them to be seperate devices.

Bold.

Bold.

If western gamers only want to play on the big screen, why are Switch sales so high in NA? AAA may not concern you, but based on your past posts, it most certainly matters to everyone else who you speak for apparently. Many AAA games are on Switch? How many? Why so many if the devs/pubs don't care and it doesn't matter and Switch customers don't want them anyway? What's the difference with physical other than the few who like the box collection or premium edition? How is it any different whether Nin loads the game onto the cart at the factory vs the user loading the game onto a card in the device? You mentioned both third party and western AAA. How many specific western AAA games does Nin make? Doesn't Doom have multiplayer? X1 in Switch is not custom, and is simply underclocked when in handheld mode. You said X3 is Xavier, and that they could do it with Xavier, yet it's 30w. Switch 2 would have little choice but to use X2, or another chip that doesn't even exist yet, and you've made it clear that guessing and making up a random idea to fit a claim isn't a valid argument so. Nin and PS systems used to always use highly custom hardware, where as now they only are using semi-custom, if not bone stock. Nin also used hardware that can potentially lead to generational upgrades, as per Nvidia CEO and their 10-20 year outlook, which is unlike Nin, and PS also gave up their all in one device goal they have been going for since they added CD to PS1, DVD to PS2, and BD to PS3. Both Switch and PS4 are fairly safe devices for both companies and don't exactly follow their typical path, so assuming PS will make the portable so it's graphics are so hardcore that the portable would only have a few hours battery life doesn't make much sense. The PS portable would at least match the Switch around 3 hours min for it's most demanding games, at whatever downgraded level they ended up at. Not to mention the battery accessories like Switch has available to it that can double the battery life, which would surely be made for the PS portable as well.

So like if Sony made a handheld game console, and had a dockable base that displayed the screen on a TV, and you could use separate controllers with the console so you could keep the handheld docked to a base on your TV, and play with a controller on your couch, or just stand the console up and play with a controller - that would be copying Nintendo?

Because if so, Sony "copied" Nintendo with the PSP Go in 2009. Here it is in action.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by82mKVEeBw&ytbChannel=Game%20Tech%20Reviews

Sony just didn't stick them all in one box.

Over 85% is not all, you're right. So tell me what kind of game compatibility the Nintendo developed Emulator for the N3DS has? Well it plays 100% of the games on the Virtual Console (as does the SNES 9X emulator), and you have no idea if it plays any of the other ones. So for all you know, the official N3DS has just as poor a compatibility rating.  You are assuming it plays every SNES game perfectly when you really have no idea.

Do you know Nintendo made its own emulator for the SNES Classic? Do you know the SNES Classic only plays about 80% of SNES games? Why do you think the N3DS emultor, which was developed earlier, is better than the one on the SNES classic?

Also, just because something was released two years after a console was released doesn't mean they were working on it for two years. They could have been working on it for two months for all we know. You have no idea how long it took Nintendo do develop that emulator, so please stop assuming.

And now you're going on another tangent as if I argued that the New 3DS shouldn't exist or something? This is completely nonsensical.

And what does the PSP have to do with anything? The PSP's homebrew emulator performance for GBA games has nothing to do with the 3DS's ability to emulate Super Nintendo games on a Nintendo developed emulator.

You can stick all that in one box and it's still far less than the switch.

All SNES VC games Nintendo put on New 3ds run perfectly at 60fps, i only say what i saw.  Nintendo didn't put other SNES games on New 3ds so i can't say anything about that. And you said New 3ds can't run all SNES games, right? So why waste the effort for 3ds - a quite weaker hardware in every way? I asked you about psp because 3ds is superior to SNES and it can run SNES VC games like you said, so PSP is a lot more modern and stronger than GBA in every way too. 

Because it's 2009 technology? The only thing it's missing is the detachable motion controls, and frankly that's the Switch's most unnecessary feature.