Alkibiádēs said:
Normchacho said:
yes, I have indeed touched a Switch game, several, including Mario Odyssey...
Is that screenshot really supposed to convince me that the visuals are on par with this?:

The image you shared is impressive compared to what? I mean, it's not like Crash is the only example either. Ratchet & Clank is about 2GB larger than Crash, are you going to try and argue that it shouldn't be much larger than Odyssey either?

|
I'm supposed to be impressed by those screenshots? Like I said, Odyssey looks better than Crash. It's only 5 GB. Not to mention the fact that those two games you mentioned only have 30 fps.
|
Pleaseeee........PLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEE tell me you're joking?
Look, i like Nintendo games. Maybe even you can call me a "fan". But this is ridiculous. There is absolutely no argument here. Odyssey, when you aren't in motion, looks decent(*edit) but that's it. Games in general always look better in motion than when still but Nintendo games especially benefit from this during gameplay. It's no secret that Nintendo games could look significantly better while retaining their art style. Which is why I can't stand when people act likke there is a linear option between art style and great graphics.