| Neodegenerate said: Did they announce that? I missed it. If that is indeed the case though, and they have them playing from the same multiplayer lobbies, I find it to be a huge mistake on the part of the devs and a disservice to the majority of the console userbase for Xbox.
|
They don't need to announce it.
Battlefield 1's framerate is uncapped. Digital foundry's testing showed the FPS to be sub 60fps on the Xbox One and Playstation 4.
Scorpio's orders-of-magnitude more performance will have it locked at 60.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
aLkaLiNE said:
This was never a rumor until Spencer got asked and answered in a way that insinuated there was forced parity. There's not, he's just being an asshole pandering to his toxic fanbase. Xb1s is the lowest common denominator, that's holding everything else back beyond any other single factor. |
Lol. Sorry, but that is a bit too far. Xbox fans are not "toxic", and the PS4 and XB1 are both fairly underpowered at this stage.
Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).
Pemalite said:
They don't need to announce it. |
Oh so Battlefield isnt a 30 FPS game that is going to be 60 FPS in one area over another, meaning it has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Gotcha.
What a silly rumor right? If Sony could force devs to not utilize X1X power they could make X1 version almost unplayble or just not release there. The cost and benefit for devs and Sony doesn't seem matching.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
If MS spend an even amount of time making 1st-party games as they did on spreading false rumours/fake news, then XoneX would have a great future coming.
Neodegenerate said:
Oh so Battlefield isnt a 30 FPS game that is going to be 60 FPS in one area over another, meaning it has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Gotcha. |
There is still different framerates. Meaning it has everything to do with the argument at hand.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
Pemalite said:
There is still different framerates. Meaning it has everything to do with the argument at hand. |
A game that targets 60FPS on PS4, PS4Pro, XB1, and XB1S, also targetting 60FPS on XB1X, doesn't actually have anything to do with the argument at hand. I have been very clear in the 30 to 60 piece. If you wanna move goalposts we are done here.
Neodegenerate said:
A game that targets 60FPS on PS4, PS4Pro, XB1, and XB1S, also targetting 60FPS on XB1X, doesn't actually have anything to do with the argument at hand. I have been very clear in the 30 to 60 piece. If you wanna move goalposts we are done here. |
It's not moving goal posts. Battlefield 1 drops down to 30fps. Scorpio is locked at 60fps. Go check out the digital foundry framerate analysis.
The point was you can have two platforms operate at different framerates and get along fine in Multiplayer.
Battlefield 1 is the example, it is the precedent. You don't like the answer? *Puts on the Aussie hat* Stiff shit.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
