Eh I prefer the uncensored "japanese porn". The actresses are not always S tier and the video length is terrible, but I can't take or support the censorship.

I don't support censorship either but it's usually just too "normal"

Plus I am not exactly buying it so neh. Not gonna matter either ways :P

There's a difference between french kissing and a regular kiss/peck.

I would never go smooching around in public- it's just gross. I wouldn't want gays, straights, or myself giving french kisses in public. It's especially worse when I see couples adding sound effects as they make intense love to each other. 

To be fair I am pretty picky, most western productions are trash to me.

OT: And as it relates to the topic so we don't derail, it is hard for me to watch men in any porn. So watching 2 men would be twice as bad. I think it is just my personal tastes though, and if the genres I prefer didn't exist I would probably take up the other genres.

How does agnostic mean you're afraid to be an atheist?

Atheists are confident in the fact that there isn't a superior deity who controls the world. Agnostics don't believe in any religion specifically, but they don't deny the possibility that there may be some sort of figure above us. it just may not be Jesus/Allah/whatever in their eyes

Most people, especially people in power, can't differentiate the two and make laws and shift societal views based on those gut reactions 

Not exactly...

Gnostic comes from the greek gnostos meaning knowledge.  If you are gnostic about any claim then you are claiming it with certainty.  If you're agnostic you're not claiming certainty.

Being an atheist just means you'd say "no" to the question "do you accept that there is a god".  It doesn't, on its own, imply confidence that there is no god.  If you are certain (or very confident) there is no god, you'd be an gnostic atheist.  If you don't believe it, but don't necessarily claim to know it for a fact, you'd be an agnostic atheist.  You can also be an agnostic theist or a gnostic theist.  They're not mutually exclusive terms.

People do use the terms as you do, but I think that's confusing.  Because if you asked me about my position regarding any god existing, I'd classify myself as an agnostic atheist.  As in, I don't believe it, but I don't know.  If you asked me if I believed in the judeochristian god, I'd classify myself as a gnostic atheist.  I'm pretty sure that doesn't exist.  If you're using gnostic or agnostic those terms have no meaning on their own.  They have to be attached to a specific claim.

Then you change the laws, beccause those are based on logic and reason.  Logically, I am convinced that there is no problem with gay people showing affection in public.  So, if there was a law to ban gay PDAs I'd be against it.

But feelings are not always (maybe not even usually) based on logic.  So, if I see gay people making out, I might still be all like ewww even if I logically don't think it's wrong.

Again, many of those in power use feelings instead of logic to dictate political decisions, because they are voted by the people, which also use gut feelings and what they think is "gross," which is why many states in the US still lags behind regarding lgbt rights (as well as climate change, healthcare, etc), as well as for the longest time racial and sex inequality.

I'm fine with individuals thinking I'm gross, I couldn't care less. The problem is those discomforts internalize for many people and change voting patterns for people that ultimately lead to negative consequences for the lgbt community. 

I had a similar train of thought to that, especially regarding adoption rights. I don't take sides, our country already denied that right in a referendum, but I do like a discussion. Especially when one of the most common arguments is that being gay is natural. But is it also natural for two male humans to produce a child? No, it's not. Always get attacked when I point it out. Am I a homophobe for that?

According to this, I'm racist towards my girlfriend. Man, she won't be happy to hear that.

Thanks for the info about its origins. I can see where you're coming from now