By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo working with third parties on in-game DLC

NintendoMan on 05 April 2008

Kasz216 said:
I hate downloadable content that you have to pay for.

Most people see it as extras.

Me I see it as stuff intentionally witheld from the original release to nickel and dime more money out of people.


 I feel excatly the same way. DLC is one of the most successful cons in gaming. I do not treat this as good news.



Manchester United 2008-09 Season - Trophies & Records

Barclays Premier League 2008-09: 1st // UEFA Champions League 2008-09: Finals (Yet To Play) // FIFA Club World Cup: Winners // UEFA Super Cup: Runners-up // FA Cup: Semi-Finals // League (Carling) Cup: Winners // FA (Charity) Community Shield: Winners
Records: First British Team To Win FIFA Club World Cup, New Record for No. Of Consecutive Clean Sheets In Premier League, New English & British League Records for Minutes Without Conceding, New Record For Going Undeafeated In Champions League (25 games ongoing), First British Team To Beat FC Porto In Portugal, First Club To Defeat Arsenal At The Emirates In European Competition, First Team In English League Football History To Win 3 Titles Back To Back On Two Seperate Ocassions
Around the Network
Tuulikk on 05 April 2008
NintendoMan said:

Kasz216 said:
I hate downloadable content that you have to pay for.

Most people see it as extras.

Me I see it as stuff intentionally witheld from the original release to nickel and dime more money out of people.


 I feel excatly the same way. DLC is one of the most successful cons in gaming. I do not treat this as good news.


Mayhap, but it gives developers another source of money off a game and I can't see anything wrong with that. It also gives the possibility of new content after the game is already done, whenever, and some gamers actually like that. It's also a security to have it for developers and another reason to develop for Wii.

There is bad sides to it also. Is the extra content worth the price? Should some of it or all of it be in the game from the start? And so on.

I think it's a must to have.



misteromar mk4 on 05 April 2008
NintendoMan said:

Kasz216 said:
I hate downloadable content that you have to pay for.

Most people see it as extras.

Me I see it as stuff intentionally witheld from the original release to nickel and dime more money out of people.


 I feel excatly the same way. DLC is one of the most successful cons in gaming. I do not treat this as good news.

I third that, all the stuff listed for FF game should be in it at the start.

 



-UBISOFT BOYCOTT!-

Words Of Wisdom on 05 April 2008
misteromar mk4 said:
NintendoMan said:

Kasz216 said:
I hate downloadable content that you have to pay for.

Most people see it as extras.

Me I see it as stuff intentionally witheld from the original release to nickel and dime more money out of people.


 I feel excatly the same way. DLC is one of the most successful cons in gaming. I do not treat this as good news.

I third that, all the stuff listed for FF game should be in it at the start.

 


Fourth.

I hate paid DLC.  The nagging thought of "Why wasn't this in the game to begin with" will always bother me.



The Ghost of RubangB on 05 April 2008

So you can opt out of half the game for half the price? Sounds like crap.



twitter.com/evaneldeneller

Sunday Fundays