Here's an interesting idea: you make sure through intelligence that the person you are targeting is a terrorist or better yet instead of drone striking random targets based on shaky intelligence cooperate with the local military who fights these terrorists everyday to investigate and deal with them since breaking international law should not be something you just shrug off. You don't just take to the skies to see if you can find yourself a 30 something male with a beard cause that is the literal(actual) criteria which they use to target individuals. Can you imagine if that was in America and it was a 30 something white male with no beard. How many innocents would that kill. Also use ways that are not as inefficient as a blind guy without any skills throwing dart. You do realise that USA made Osama Bin Ladin who he was. He was an american agent gone rogue and on that subject, if the Pakistani government did not know about the ladin but you also let terrorists hijack planes from the Pentagon. Do all sorts of crazy shit in your own airspace and could do nothing as they attacked the pentagon and the twin towers. If you claim that the Pakistani government willfully did nothing to stop Bin Ladin then I can just as easily claim USA did nothing to stop 9/11 and might have even facilitated it

So....North Korea just attempted ANOTHER missile test and FAILED....Lol.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/15/asia/north-korea-missile-test/index.html


No confirmation on if it was intercontinental or not and we are still arguing.....

All the more CONFIRMATION this thread is BULLSHIT...🤣🤣🤣

It wasnt a fascist regime when it was founded, it used to be Marxist-Leninist and turned to it own Juche ideology a different branche of communist/socialist idology.

Juche is not a Fascist idiology. In fact Fascism isnt even an idiology its a reactonary tedandcy inside capitalism, that happens if liberal democracy cant substain the system against a communist uprising anymore. Thats why you see people associating all kind of things with it without really being able to explain what it really is.

The fact that they can build nuclear weapons proofs it, every other none nuclear country wouldnt even come as far espacially Third World countries, of which many would actually like to have a nuke i assume. No one is starving in North Korea now, they defentiatley made progress in the last view years.

The only reason why North Korea exist is because they have a 2 Million army, most of them growing up without the internet and who are actually ready to die for their country wittout getting an extrenomic paycheck like American soldiers do. But this is just my opinion.

Why shouldnt we argue? This thread is proof that people are actually are more worried about the US than North Korea now. 

And this failed test still doesnt guarantee the US under Trump wont respond.

It also look like it could be done on propoise by North Korea as a tactical move, to show the US  that they still are ready but not to provoke the US at the same time.

SK went to war with SK. It was declared and it fits the definition of war. All of the other examples you mentioned are absurd. My definition fits perfectly with today's definition of it. You're the one that is confused on this. 

Since you're still not getting it. 

war

/wôr/

noun

1.

a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state:

The US is not at war with those countries. 

Just to check, is your argument legitimately "they have nuclear weapons, therefore they must be so developed that citizens aren't starving?" If so, Stalinist Russia would like a word with you.

But no, hunger is definitely an issue in North Korea. The UN estimates that 70% of the Korean population is food insecure, four fifths of all North Korean children are believed to suffer from acute malnutrition, and on top of that, last year, North Korea publicly warned its own citizens in the Rodong Sinnum (its own mouthpiece newspaper) that they should brace themselves for an incoming famine while simultaneously requesting half a million tons of food aid from other countries.

Yes, that's exactly what the US is doing. They're using arms (troops with weapons and bombs) to get into conflict with other nations and states.

America might be a bigger but North Korea is increasing its potential to become a bigger problem every year. What if they sell their nukes on the black market or they manage to actually develop missles to cross over to the US, what if they just decide its time to blow up south korea.

America might have made more of a mess and continues to do so but they are more predictable and will inflict less damage then North Korea will potentially do if left unchecked.

Where did you read up on the criteria used?

It's called the element of surprise. I think that's one reason why drone strikes are appealing to military operations. Also appealed to the 911 hijackers.

We technically are at war with North Korea.  Korean War never actually ended, no peace treaty was ever signed, just a ceasefire.  So we have been at war for a very long time...