barneystinson69 said:
Right. And there absolutely won't be consequences. Because China and Russia will just do the same, is that correct? |
Dude UsA has more funding for military then the next ten combined so even halving your budget would still pit you in a much better position then China and Russia combined
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
| d21lewis said: Sometimes it makes you wonder who the good guys are and who's the villain. |
"Sometimes" dude the villains are clearly USA and the terrorists the world knows that much and there are no good guys, heroes or saviours in sight. Its all of them stomping on and killing innocents to see who can kill more
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
| NightDragon83 said: Quick question everyone... if the reason for all of the terrorist attacks perpetrated against the US and the west over the last two decades is because of all the times the west has gotten involved militarily in the Middle East, then shouldn't the Japanese have been kamkaze-ing us every hour on the hour for the last 70 years for what we did to them during WWII i.e. Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of additional civilians that were napalmed to death in various fire bombing campaigns? Funny how of all the military excursions the US and western Europe have been involved in over the past century, it's only radicalized members of a certain religion that routinely carry out terror attacks against innocent civilians throughout the globe in response. We're best buds with the Japanese and Vietnamese nowadays after nuking and napalming their entire countries for the better part of a decade. NATO got involved in Kosovo in the 90s and bombed the hell out of Milosevic's forces in the aftermath of the violent breakup of the former Yugoslavia republic, but everything is peachy-keen today. Maybe we need to give the so-called "moderates" in the Middle East as well as our so-called allies in the region a final ultimatum... take care of the radical elements amongst your citizenry, or we will, once and for all. |
Its funny and sad how you think. Japan attack was during a world wat and ended in a couple of years at best. The Japanese not only recovered but prospered to reach new heights while the middle east has been a stomping grounds for Murica for decades and the people there are getting no chance to recover and living in constant poverty and fear from enemies all around. The muricans kill them and the terrorists kill them. NATO kills them and Russia and Assad and any party involved kills civilians. In such a sitsituation only pschopaths can thrive
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
| jason1637 said: These type of things happen in the battlefield. |
Then why does it happen outside the battlefield.the USA for the third idiot has been killing innocents through drone strikes in countries like Pakistan in numbers of hundreds and from my experience in living and travelling all across paksit all my life, its no damn battlefield or war zone
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
TheLegendaryWolf said:
The 1400 civilians killed weren't targeted. The US military didn't just say"time to kill more innocents" no, you can thank ISIS cowards for using civilians as human shields every time the allied coalition tries to eradicate terrorists. It's unfortunate that so many civilians lost their lives but the cold hard truth is that it was inevitable. By your logic the US and the coalition should just leave ISIS alone to their devices and let them take over the country, not only endangering the citizens but also the humanitarian aids that are helping the injured civilians. |
No they should stop supporting rebel terrorists and let Assad destroy them all. Stop being a damn roadblock and as history has told us any land the USA military lays its feet on it poisons and destorys be it Vietnam Afghanistan Iraq Syria Lebanon etc. The damn USA should let a country decide for itself for a change instead of enforcing hollow ideals to keep its military busy with something and I ebelieve the Americans would have no problem saying let's kill some çollateral damage. Its aiming practice time boys
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
Aura7541 said:
It's a pretty big dilemna. If you want to avoid killing innocents, then you need to entirely remove yourself from the armed conflict. There's no other alternative, but that will lead to ISIS being able to do whatever the hell they want which will be really bad. Ideally, the US should do do whatever it can to avoid armed conflict, but alas Obama decided to get involved in Syria and here we are with Trump recently ordering missile attacks. |
The freaking rebels Murica supports are terrorists. There is army capable of destroying daesh and the rebels if the USA does not butt in and there is a leader called Assad. Whenever the USA is not active botht the rebels and daesh loose ground quickly but then USA has to get involved and they regain the lands causing a stalemate. The USA is being a y nuisance
User is warned for spamming - Aura7541
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
RolStoppable said:
There's virtually never anything about Pakistan in the news. Has this happened recently? |
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/the-bush-years-pakistan-strikes-2004-2009
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2009-pakistan-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2010-pakistan-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2011-pakistan-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2012-pakistan-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2013-pakistan-drone-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2014-pakistan-drone-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2015-pakistan-drone-strikes
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/drone-war/data/obama-2016-pakistan-drone-strikes
To All people who think USA is on some righteous cause it is not. All it does is leave carnage, death and destruction in its wake. It created and strengthened all major terrorists in the middle eat by meddling in countries' affairs and attacking countries on flase narrative thus destroying its leadership and causing terrorists to flourish. It also supports rebels which are major Syrian terrorists in and of themselves and Daesh emerged as a splinter group from these very rebels. Calling daesh Isil or Isis is a shame and calling USA humanarian, helpful or the good guys is just wrong and calling terrorists rebels is a slap to actual rebels who have fought for the betterment of their country in many nations across history
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
RolStoppable said:
There's virtually never anything about Pakistan in the news. Has this happened recently? |
See the biased corporate media. It has happened as I said hundreds of times with no coverage from western media whatsoever. You probably don't even know if terrorism has gotten worse or better in Pakistan since western media never reports on a terror attack here as compared to France or the like
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
Even this seems bull. Way more civilians are killed then that the ratio of civilian killed to terrorist killed is much higher
In fact 2013 and onwards are pure bull
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
