US Has Allegedly Killed 1400+ Civilians In the Past Month

[Eagle367]

Aura7541 said:

TheLegendaryWolf said:

The 1400 civilians killed weren't targeted. The US military didn't just say"time to kill more innocents" no, you can thank ISIS cowards for using civilians as human shields every time the allied coalition tries to eradicate terrorists. It's unfortunate that so many civilians lost their lives but the cold hard truth is that it was inevitable. By your logic the US and the coalition should just leave ISIS alone to their devices and let them take over the country, not only endangering the citizens but also the humanitarian aids that are helping the injured civilians. 

It's a pretty big dilemna. If you want to avoid killing innocents, then you need to entirely remove yourself from the armed conflict. There's no other alternative, but that will lead to ISIS being able to do whatever the hell they want which will be really bad. Ideally, the US should do do whatever it can to avoid armed conflict, but alas Obama decided to get involved in Syria and here we are with Trump recently ordering missile attacks.

The freaking rebels Murica supports are terrorists. There is  army capable of destroying daesh and the rebels if the USA does not butt in and there is a leader called Assad. Whenever the USA is not active botht the rebels and daesh loose ground quickly but then USA has to get involved and they regain the lands causing a stalemate. The USA is being a y nuisance

User is warned for spamming - Aura7541