By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Trump to nominate pro-immigration free-trading globalist as CEA chair

Robert_Downey_Jr. on 09 April 2017
Eagle367 said:
This is good. A hypocritical Donny is better for us than an honest one. I heard recently that for some reason a Fulbright scholar who had been to USA studying was denied entry after leaving to visit his family in Pakistan

He never said immigrants are bad.  He said they need proper vetting and they need to come in legally.  Why do liberals always ignore the illegal part?  That's important



I am Iron Man

Around the Network
barneystinson69 on 09 April 2017
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Eagle367 said:
This is good. A hypocritical Donny is better for us than an honest one. I heard recently that for some reason a Fulbright scholar who had been to USA studying was denied entry after leaving to visit his family in Pakistan

He never said immigrants are bad.  He said they need proper vetting and they need to come in legally.  Why do liberals always ignore the illegal part?  That's important

Yes, and bringing 2 million immigrants per year should certainly help the average American worker. Boo! If this turns out to be true, you bet your ass he will lose "bigly" in the next election!



Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).

VGPolyglot on 09 April 2017
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Eagle367 said:
This is good. A hypocritical Donny is better for us than an honest one. I heard recently that for some reason a Fulbright scholar who had been to USA studying was denied entry after leaving to visit his family in Pakistan

He never said immigrants are bad.  He said they need proper vetting and they need to come in legally.  Why do liberals always ignore the illegal part?  That's important

Yes, because all of the European immigrants that came throughout the 1700s and 1800s were being meticulously vetted, and the numerous Cuban refugees that came through boats were all carefully researched and allowed in.



sethnintendo on 09 April 2017
VGPolyglot said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:

He never said immigrants are bad.  He said they need proper vetting and they need to come in legally.  Why do liberals always ignore the illegal part?  That's important

Yes, because all of the European immigrants that came throughout the 1700s and 1800s were being meticulously vetted, and the numerous Cuban refugees that came through boats were all carefully researched and allowed in.

They did let Scarface slip through the cracks.



VGPolyglot on 09 April 2017
sethnintendo said:
VGPolyglot said:

Yes, because all of the European immigrants that came throughout the 1700s and 1800s were being meticulously vetted, and the numerous Cuban refugees that came through boats were all carefully researched and allowed in.

They did let Scarface slip through the cracks.

Yes, they let a great entrepreneur enter the country.



Around the Network
DeletedAccount3 on 09 April 2017

User Requested removal



VGPolyglot on 09 April 2017
vivster said:
Next 50 Billion Dollar Project: Drilling Mexican sized holes into the wall to let immigrants through.

Now the three-way joint World Cup bid makes sense: by 2026 it'll all be one country!



Leadified on 09 April 2017
VGPolyglot said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:

He never said immigrants are bad.  He said they need proper vetting and they need to come in legally.  Why do liberals always ignore the illegal part?  That's important

Yes, because all of the European immigrants that came throughout the 1700s and 1800s were being meticulously vetted, and the numerous Cuban refugees that came through boats were all carefully researched and allowed in.

Considering what the Europeans did in the Americas, I think you're unintentionally proving his point



VGPolyglot on 09 April 2017
Leadified said:
VGPolyglot said:

Yes, because all of the European immigrants that came throughout the 1700s and 1800s were being meticulously vetted, and the numerous Cuban refugees that came through boats were all carefully researched and allowed in.

Considering what the Europeans did in the Americas, I think you're unintentionally proving his point

It was mainly the military, government personnel and rich landowners that did that to the natives, not your average poor guy coming to the U.S. to make a living.



Leadified on 09 April 2017
VGPolyglot said:
Leadified said:

Considering what the Europeans did in the Americas, I think you're unintentionally proving his point

It was mainly the military, government personnel and rich landowners that did that to the natives, not your average poor guy coming to the U.S. to make a living.

Your average person is not a consquistador but I doubt the settlers were too concerned with the well-being of the natives either.