Knack,Drive club, The Order and killzone are average games at best that can't compare to any of the ps3 games listed above in general reviews.It's like me stating Lair or perhaps folk lore for ps3 (sure there is more to list). First light is a dlc and I am sure a lot of ps3 games had dlc too so no that doesn't count. If we are counting indie games, we can count a lot more psn games like that one ratchet and clank indie game for ps3. Also, I forgot about Heavy Rain too for ps3.

I'm obviously taking about quality. Sony has a lot of ps3 games that I left out because it's better not to be shown (lair, folklore and eye of judgement,ect). You know quality over quanity. And dying light is still DLC to a game that many ps3 games has.  If I showed every ps3 games from 2006 to 2010 it will be way more especially since you are counting indies and dlc.

Could you elaborate on the bolded? It seems a bit early to be passing that kind of judgement on MM. Dream has had a slow development, but it's understandable given how ambitious its goals are for what is ultimately a very small studio, and that a portion of the studio spent a while with Tearaway. 

Dreams seems to be a game that isn't going to do very well financially and we haven't heard or seen anything from it yet for a while. Sony is shutting down a lot of UK studios, kind of like Microsoft did with Lionhead. Their laws and taxes are very anti business and games have to sell well or they can't be continue. That is the world we live in. Trust me, I would love certain games to be made still like the Resistance series.

But the ps3 did have more titles than ps4 first 3 years if we count indies and such too regarding sony owned ips. I mean the list you given there was a clear advantage in quanity and quality for ps3 and you didn't even list half the games on the ps3 like eye of judgement, star dust, lair, folk lore,ect. I was still referring to quality when me and you were talking to each other because generally, those ps3 games were reviewed way better than the ps4 games all around.

Yet with the ps4 being out this gen and in your recent memory you still couldn't match the ps3 in terms of quantity or quality. That right there is very telling. This is because Sony realizes this generation exclusives hold very little weight compare to third party games. Thats why at the end of the year Sony will only have GT Sport with only 150 cars... and a bunch of third party marketing deal from what we see right now. Which honestly is the most strategic move to make because marketing is cheaper and helps a system out more than exclusives. Yoshida even said only four out of ten exclusive games make a profit http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/07/04/shuhei-yoshida-only-four-out-of-ten-playstation-games-make-money-but-sony-will-always-support-talent/. 

If you're focused on quality (which i assume you measure through critical reception), shouldn't you be including MS in your argument? I do personally agree that Sony's output this generation has been worse (though the PS4 in general has been an improvement for me), but i feel that's doubly true for MS. They seem to be really struggling to push out major releases capable of garnering anything close to the kind of positive reception they were seeing last gen. Forza is the only major exception, with their best received titles outside of that being Gears 4 and Halo 5 (both sitting at 84).

It's certainly possible you'll end up being right, but it seems as bit excessive to come to condemn them on the basis of speculation. 

Not necessarily, you can argue video game reviews or fan receptions. I and most people (review wise) found the games I listed on ps3 better than games on ps4, but I agree stalmate for now just so we don't kill each other or you banning me.

1. I was focus on both quality and quantity.

2. Microsoft output has been about the same compare to previous generation. Yes, Halo, Gears , Forza is being used quite a bit. During the 360 generation Microsoft only seemed better because of the third party titles they got first , but they weren't too much better in terms of first party. I just wish we got a Fable game finally. Microsoft has supported a lot of games that are exclusives/console exclusives that they don't own but aren't on Sony platform. However, Xbox one to me has always been about the best place to play my multi platform games (the games I spend 95% of my time) for console such as my favorite online network, my favorite controller, features/UI,ect and now with scorpio the games should run and play significantly better than any console. Plus I like online games a lot and Microsoft/EA offers me the best multiplayer games imo (I'm addicted to Halo Wars 2 right now).

The overall number of titles they've been publishing (your qualifier from an earlier discussion) has been comparable, but the reception of those titles has been considerably less positive. MS had published 5 90+ titles by this point last gen, and many more 80+. If you want to follow a different definition to earlier and remove various 360 titles from the comparison then fine, but all that does is shift the discussion from "MS have seen a dip in quality" to "MS have always under-performed". Neither is particularly positive for MS.

As i said, i do agree Sony have under-performed on the publishing front compared to last gen, but MS fit quite snugly in the same box.