By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - we need more realistic games

 

...

Yes, we need more. 30 44.78%
 
No, this is not mature enough. 37 55.22%
 
Total:67
Turkish on 01 February 2017

i just want a game like bbc planet earf



Around the Network
onionberry on 01 February 2017
Turkish said:
i just want a game like bbc planet earf

big black cock planet earf?



onionberry on 01 February 2017
Scisca said:

In that case I guess you're a sucker for Witcher 3. Also, I haven't heard anyone labeling Witcher 3 as immature or unrealistc.

yeah this is an amazing game, but you're smart and you know this is realistic. For a lot of people this is the colorful dlc.

"I love this DLC looks so colorful and full of fantasy"

-random youtube commenter 



SvennoJ on 01 February 2017
onionberry said:
Scisca said:
We need more realistic photos and fewer photoshopped bullshots like those in the OP.



Conina on 01 February 2017

Doom ain't colorful enough?



Around the Network
Turkish on 01 February 2017
onionberry said:
Turkish said:
i just want a game like bbc planet earf

big black cock planet earf?

lol girl u naughty!



onionberry on 01 February 2017
SvennoJ said:
onionberry said:

both realistic 



onionberry on 01 February 2017
Bandorr said:
SvennoJ said:

Perfect comparison. The first picture could exist. May exist. As is, not photographed or touched up etc. But it probably only exists one place.

The bottom one I immediately think looks real. Plus is is haunting and creepy. And it could exist really anywhere. It is just a bunch of dead trees. There is no effort involved. You don't need to spend years cultivating the flowers, and you don't need to "create" it.

both are real in the real world. The "dark" picture is created by nature, I'm pretty sure that sky is blue and those trees had pretty leafs, but at the time of the picture everything was dark.



Yerm on 01 February 2017

if i wanted this level of detail i would watch a movie. you know, some nice hands-free entertainment, beautifully detailed over the course of 1 to 2 hours, not having to worry about what if i die? what if i miss a secret area? just have everything play out exactly as it should without lag or server errors, or glitches.

nah... just have the games be fun and the detail be enough to get the point across. no game ever got long term praise for being well-detailed. unique art styles maybe, but jeez i dont think Nintendo has even hit that level of color and they literally just made a new IP where you competitively shoot color at people



SvennoJ on 01 February 2017
Bandorr said:
SvennoJ said:

 

Perfect comparison. The first picture could exist. May exist. As is, not photographed or touched up etc. But it probably only exists one place.

The bottom one I immediately think looks real. Plus is is haunting and creepy. And it could exist really anywhere. It is just a bunch of dead trees. There is no effort involved. You don't need to spend years cultivating the flowers, and you don't need to "create" it.

It's a park near me when it flooded in Januari, late afternoon. It gets very colorful too here in spring and fall. That's what I miss most in rpgs, seasons. More realistic weather helps too.