The amout of bullshit these guys try to sell is just amazing.
The xbox 1 cant handle VR, the best they can do is some game streaming to the rift on a virtual room. Now they expect us to believe a handheld device that isnt even half as powerful as the XB1 will do VR.
Next time they will piss on our faces and say it's raining
| setsunatenshi said: The amout of bullshit these guys try to sell is just amazing. The xbox 1 cant handle VR, the best they can do is some game streaming to the rift on a virtual room. Now they expect us to believe a handheld device that isnt even half as powerful as the XB1 will do VR. Next time they will piss on our faces and say it's raining |
Talking about bullshit.
Do you know mobile phones can handle VR? lol, The comment about XBO makes no sense, and this is not an official announcement to the public, they are not expecting you to believe anyrthing this are actual things they are working on.
| setsunatenshi said: The amout of bullshit these guys try to sell is just amazing. The xbox 1 cant handle VR, the best they can do is some game streaming to the rift on a virtual room. Now they expect us to believe a handheld device that isnt even half as powerful as the XB1 will do VR. Next time they will piss on our faces and say it's raining |
I'm thinking that Nintendo's VR will obviously more closely resemble Samsung Gear VR rather than Rift, Vive, and PSVR.
Bet with Intrinsic:
The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.
Goodnightmoon said:
Talking about bullshit. |
Comparing Google Cardboard VR and VR like Oculus Rift is the real bullshit here.
Yeah, Nintendo can sell a Nintendo Cardboard later (but the mobiles cardboard will be better because of the screen). But they can't do a real VR solution. The whole industry needs power to make VR work, Nintendo won't magically make VR work without power.
Yup, we definitely seeing VR addon for Switch.
The requirements for VR are 'run 3D game at 60fps or higher'. Lenses and resolution determine how good the VR is.
The 3DS does VR at ~3% in the form of AR games (AR@100%=VR).
RE7 isn't likely on the current Switch model but Nintendo has a huge back catalog of 3D games that can run at 90fps on Switch even in portable mode.
Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)
Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!
| Pyro as Bill said: The 3DS does VR at ~3% in the form of AR games (AR@100%=VR). |
What ?
With the power the Switch has, and the resolution and the current problems of the VR, my guess is a Nintendo system that is VR ready will only come next gen, and that they are studying it now so that they can offer a good experience in the future.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1
Faelco said:
Comparing Google Cardboard VR and VR like Oculus Rift is the real bullshit here. Yeah, Nintendo can sell a Nintendo Cardboard later (but the mobiles cardboard will be better because of the screen). But they can't do a real VR solution. The whole industry needs power to make VR work, Nintendo won't magically make VR work without power. |
VR needs to be affordable to be a good product, and it isn't, this would be an affordable (and portable) one, if wasn't because the screen of the console is 720p it could be ready for VR already, leave it to Nintendo to take profit of "weak" hardware to make great looking games, not every VR game needs to look like REVII on the Pro.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
