I added something which you ignored. I was commenting on what you said as being a bunch of fluff.  

Hi y'all. I'm back from my bancation. I want to congratulate you on cherry picking through my previous posts and taking everthing I said totally out of context. Fine work indeed.

*Complains that his posts are cherry picked and taken out of context*
*Doesn't elaborate which portions of his posts are cherry picked and taken out of context*
#ThreadLogic

If I were to describe your thread in four words, it's "Guilty until proven innocent". Digital Foundry's reputation is tarnished if they are proven to have spread false information beyond reasonable doubt. Your assertion is ultimately based off of knee-jerk reaction to negativity... negativity that was the result of expectations going wild from some people.

Digital Foundry is a business and is about internet traffic/sponsors at the end of the day.

They make lots of money stirring up the fanboy wars just as any other gaming site. They know who their most frequent flyer club is and its evident in how they tailor their content. Notice how 900p vs 1080p was such a high point of contention for all these years , then how they selling faux 4k as almost 4K and impressive....to now debating or not whether Scorpio will deliver native 4K without seeing its first game.

DF's opinion of the differences between 900p and 1080p are pretty consistent with how they feel about checkerboard 1800p and native 4k. The only major variation is the context of those resolutions. When the PS4 and X1 released, 1080p was seen as the expected standard. When the X1 often missed that targeted, it was disappointing for many. For the Pro and Scorpio, 4k isn't anything close to the standard yet, so 1800pC is still seen as impressive. A native 4k is just even more impressive, and they have plenty of praise to offer the image quality of the few games that currently hit it. That praise will no doubt be extended to 4k Scorpio titles.

DF's opinion of the differences between 900p and 1080p are pretty consistent with how they feel about checkerboard 1800p and native 4k. The only major variation is the context of those resolutions. When the PS4 and X1 released, 1080p was seen as the expected standard. When the X1 often missed that targeted, it was disappointing for many. For the Pro and Scorpio, 4k isn't anything close to the standard yet, so 1800pC is still seen as impressive. A native 4k is just even more impressive, and they have plenty of praise to offer the image quality of the few games that currently hit it. That praise will no doubt be extended to 4k Scorpio titles.

But what do you think about Digital Foundry affecting the sales of game consoles with very early spec leaks of hardware that is not even finalized yet. Some people are saying they changed their minds about pre-ordering the Switch because of DF's opinion. No one knows the real specs of the Switch yet.

While i'm against leaks more often than i'm in favour of them, hardware spec leaks are one of the types i approve of. They don't spoil much, just allow the consumer to make a more educated purchase. If the leak is wrong and the actual specs are something the person who cancelled their pre-order is happy with then they'll still buy the system, it'll just be a bit later. If the leak is right however, then that consumer was able to avoid disappointment. I consider that an overall positive risk.

Personally, i wouldn't pre-order the Switch right now even if i thought it was going to be the best thing ever. If a company (in this instance Nintendo) isn't interested in providing me the information necessary for me to be fully informed, then i'm likewise not interested in being an early adopter.

Yeah, me. Even though like half a dozen other people have been calling you out on your nonsense. But yeah, I get it, namecalling is way easier than actually debating the topic at hand. Especially when you don't have any real argument to stand on.