mutantsushi said:
FromDK said:
Cant you guys see what this is.
|
1. What is the fundamental difference here between what you describe and Ninty going 3rd party? I don't see it. Ninty is known for underpowered consoles, meaning their low power games are trivially portable to many platforms. 2. No reason it can't be on ALL Android devices, PS, Xbox, whatever. They don't worry about multiple HW configs because they optimize performance around lowest common denominator and simply don't try to fully leverage power of specs above that, as it still works at least as good. If Ninty's goal is for it's games to be everywhere and not limited to Ninty consoles they don't need special deal with NVIDIA. 3. Why would Ninty let their strategy hinge on consumers happening to buy a TV with NVIDIA chip? 4. Why would TV manufacturers want to subjugate their own value in favor of promoting NVIDIA chip to consumers? 5. Why would Ninty target (NVIDIA subset of) TVs when they can target PS/Xbox who all have the controllers needed for gameplay? (and whose consumers by buying dedicated game machine are strongly likely to buy many games, unlike TV consumers)
|
1. If they went 3. party they will have no controll.. and not earn any on 3.party titles.. This is more like steam.
2. No.. Nintendo offcourse dont want to support there main competetors.. and most important.. They are not compatible with Switch
And why are you talking about power?.. The point is that future Tegra chips can run "what ever there is on Switch"
3. They open up a new marked.. that could be insane big. Good strategy
4. Lets take LG.. at the moment they earn nothing at games.. if they used a switch compitabel chip.. they could get (dont know but lets say) 30% of all games sold on that tv.. (both Nintendo and 3 party)
5. Like i said.. it would not make sense to support other gaming platforms.. and they are also different hardware