Hm...well I feel like Miz's nameclaim is a weird choice of character, weird enough that i dont think he made it up...its like, such a weird character that i feel like it would be unlikely someone would counterclaim it...

@miz - I disagree, i think nameclaims are helpful for people that have played persona to have a grasp at what the others role could be without the person plainly giving it up.

Spurge, im very disappointed in you bringing this back up, people suspect me now because i said i trusted you and now you're distancing yourself.

Hey spurge, did you get a chance to read my post here?

darwin being a noob wasn't the problem I had with him.

My problem with darwin was that he had said previously that he sided with a lynch, then later on changed his mind, and basically defended stefl with stefl's own words.

Furthermore, when I posted my analysis, he said that my lengthy analysis pointed to me being a dangerous player, but didn't say whether he liked it or disliked it. Rather, he made a post about my analysis and basically wrote everything that stefl had already said about it. Additionally, he parroted stefl when stefl said he preferred a no lynch, yet the day before, darwin was saying that a no lynch won't help us find mafia.

Basically, he was defending stefl, using stefl's own words, but there was seemingly no reason to do so. If darwin were town, why would he trust stefl so much that he'd use stefl's own words to defend him? The case against stefl wasn't great, but it was enough that anyone in town should've considered him somewhat suspicious. Darwin showed no such suspicion, and even called me dangerous, which I said later on- is something that I see in mafia quicktopics very often.

You even said this in the mafia qt
Prof has old players to string along with his ideas. New players may not have the same faith in his decision making just because of recent games. But at this time he could pull all of the old cronies along with whatever he says.

Need to always tread lightly with prof. Either get into a logical huge argument that spreads confusion or keep your distance no matter what he says. But if you give him a few inches he will take over.

This goes for even if you are town with him. Play by his rules or you could be trying to stay alive still.

Darwin said I was a strong player, and then a dangerous player. The weird thing was, he said he could tell by my analysis that I was a strong player,
But then he completely disagreed with everything I posted.

It logically doesn't make sense.
How could he tell I was good, but disagree with the very thing that he said made me look strng?

So far, I've seen arm post some suspicions about some players, attempt to role claim out of the blue, softclaiming a power role, and I also agree with some of his suspects.
He hasn't said anything illogical and seems to question a lot of motives.

Darwin was nothing like this last game.

Trucks did have fake nameclaims for the serial killer and mafia last game though I'm not sure whether or not Clyde will have them

None were used if I recall correctly, so town wouldn't have known, does seem a bit odd, but is an assumption

Also why is my vote on spurge when I voted for trucks?

Wut

Ninja'd