Well im assuming u just meant messages and im confused now.

You threw shade without any sort of questioning. Based on everything we have now, I think a vote from anyone would be fine, as they've gathered info to make judgments based on changes in playstyle and more so. I am not saying we should be reluctant, I am saying we should be gathering information and looking for slip ups through discussion.

But your first post was a vote. Where nothing has even occured.

Scum move, and that's why my vote sticks.

You know your role right, though? Ie. you checked from where the orange thing which flashes next to your profile picture is coming from.

I got a message from him but i still dont know what a quicktopic is or what it has to do with what i said

There's so much wrong with this post that you're giving me a headache. I'm not even pushing for your lynch, and I told you to go and prove you aren't a liability

How can you keep bringing up the last game and have an issue with this? I was on both Stefl and darwin at different points, but they slipped through the cracks. My leads led to Mr.P and Clyde.

I'm not asking for other people to do my work, I'm saying I don't want my work to go to waste. If I'm focused on a few particular people and forget some points I made against someone else or questions go unanswered, it would be a good thing if someone brings them back up and better if they can take the my lead and make a case from it. I can't win alone.

No, I didn't. But yes, I am willing to lynch you over no lynch. If you are town and continue to be obsessed with yourself despite the advice to move on, you are proving the point that you're a liability.

I liked your FoS, but you didn't exaplin why you didn't like the push for a time limit. spurge can't twist nothing while asking for your intention.

@spurge: you mind if I answer that or do you want zero to?

I'm not a big fan of the interaction between Mr.P and Noctis. I don't think Noctis' tactics would have worked but I didn't really see the point in calling it out. Then Noctis's reaction to being called out by Mr. P was over the top too though. The weirdest part is Mr. P trying out the same kind of tactic on Arminillo right after.

I'm still ambivalent about Stefl, Miz has been unusually quiet. I was going to call out a link between you and Linkz yesterday when you failed to immediately call him scum when he said he might want to a vote for you but you eventually came around and you predictably think he's evil now.

Mr.P is asking a similar question to the one I asked darwin last game. However, he went further to be consistent about his point against Noctis's one-dimensional questions. The question potentially has deeper value behind it, though Mr.P would have to answer himself if that's actually the case. Why do you think it's shady?

I understand your point about a bloated Day One being just clutter and confusion. I lean towards a time limit causing rushed decisions instead of informed ones, so I think it should only be implemented if conversations have dried up.

By conversation, you mean people making halfbaked assumptions based on previous games, right? Either way, somebody dies after day 1, and I personally cant participate too well in this discussion of he said/she said last game stuff. I also dont appreciate being used as human shield for free accusations and manipulation. I think I support a time limit as well.