Teeqoz said:
But we did get something out of the recount: The knowledge that the system works. Hopefully this will quell shrieks (from both camps) about voter fraud, not only this election but in future elections as well.
|
A recount does not help with voter fraud.
All a recount does is prove the the numbers were basically correct. It doesn't catch if someone votes twice or more than once. It does not catch if ballots were thrown away instead of put through the machine, or coutned by hand. It does not catch if illegals, felons or underage people voted. Ect. I mean look at Michigan. They had to quit the recount because of rules when they found descrepancies. They woudl find things like, there were 1,000 votes in the county, yet only 100 ballets to be found. The law says if you find something like that, you can't recount that county. (Make sense /sarcasm.)
All it does is count the votes there. The only thing it helps with is those thinking that the booths were hacked and the numbers wrong. Which if anyone knows anythign about the machines, they are not connected at all and are also off teh grid. A hacker would have to go to each machine individually to hack them. Sure some could be hacke,d but it is a big country.
barneystinson69 said:
People donated money for the hope that they could flip the state to Clinton. Let me ask you Stein, why didn't we see recounts in New Hampshire or Minnesota or Nevada? I mean those where all close states too, so why not? Was it because Trump lost those states? She tricked Hillary voters into essentially giving free money to her party. #Scam
|
Basically that.
Also what happens to her money? She raised like 7 million or something right? Michigand Pensylvania basically cancelled or didn't do the recount and thus didn't spend nearly the 7 million.
