JWeinCom said:
LudicrousSpeed said: I am shocked that a Democrat is against Drumpf. I mean.. what was the alternative? Hillary, who has been in Washington for over 30 years and is deeply entrenched with all the insiders and special interests and donors? I voted Hillary, but it's not as if either candidate was great. Warren is just butt hurt her party lost. |
The alternative is Trump actually fulfilling his promise by finding people who aren't lobbyists. Trust me, it's entirely possible.
|
Yeah - JWeinCom (Likely, Obama, Clinton voter) posting on a video game web forum, knows how to filter out lobbyists. LOL.
Trust me, in any organization there will be necessary evils that you have to accept. Trump needs people who are good at what they do, working on his behalf, toward the vision he has. Often times, these same talented people are making money and in positions of relative evil. As for his promises this isn't very hard, Trump was establishing the framework and parameter of EVERY discussion and promise.
Peter Thiel said it best : "I think one thing that should be distinguished here is that the media is always taking Trump literally. It never takes him seriously, but it always takes him literally. ... I think a lot of voters who vote for Trump take Trump seriously but not literally, so when they hear things like the Muslim comment or the wall comment, their question is not, 'Are you going to build a wall like the Great Wall of China?' or, you know, 'How exactly are you going to enforce these tests?' What they hear is we're going to have a saner, more sensible immigration policy."