What's Info Wars got that MSNBC, CNN, and Fox don't?
Thought provoking informative interviews from a wide array of guests from different political and idealogical backgrounds. To name a few : Chuck Norris, Billy Corgan, Ron Paul, Louis Farrakan, Nigel Farage, Johnathan Davis, Willie Nelson, Donald Trump, Russel Brand, Ralph Nader, Ed Asner, Charlie Sheen etc). Jones despite being an eccentric has at least held a bipartisan attack on Clinton, Bush and Obama in comparison to the sites listed above.
Pretty sure plenty comparable interviews can be found from aforementioned news outlets.
1. It was a stupid move for the Clinton campaign to try and go after Trumps "ties" to Russia.
2. The flat tax is fucking stupid and anyone who supports it doesn't understand economics on even the most basic level.
3. This person is a terrible presenter from a public speaking perspective.
4. The presenter isn't even trying to hide her bias.
5. Now I know where this stupid idea that a person can be attacked for the people they defended as a public defender.
6. They deliberately misinterpret the part about the underwear at the crime lab. Even from the cut out clip they showed it's clear that she was talking about how they went about testing them at the lab.
7. They aren't even trying to be a news site. They aren't. That clip at the end where they try and make it sound like Hillary Clinton wants nuclear war is insane. It's unashamed dictator level propaganda.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.
LMAO, the audacity of some people here still trying to accuse Trump of some russian collusion conspiracy theory even AFTER the FACT that the FBI had determined that there was NO CLEAR LINK ...
Thought provoking informative interviews from a wide array of guests from different political and idealogical backgrounds. To name a few : Chuck Norris, Billy Corgan, Ron Paul, Louis Farrakan, Nigel Farage, Johnathan Davis, Willie Nelson, Donald Trump, Russel Brand, Ralph Nader, Ed Asner, Charlie Sheen etc). Jones despite being an eccentric has at least held a bipartisan attack on Clinton, Bush and Obama in comparison to the sites listed above.
Pretty sure plenty comparable interviews can be found from aforementioned news outlets.
Not the context of the interview or subject matter that is being discussed. The Billy Corgan series is an excellent example.
fatslob-:O said: LMAO, the audacity of some people here still trying to accuse Trump of some russian collusion conspiracy theory even AFTER the FACT that the FBI had determined that there was NO CLEAR LINK ...
I mean...too be fair, people tend to listen to the FBI when they say what they want to hear. At least, that seems to be the case with this election cycle.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.
I mean...too be fair, people tend to listen to the FBI when they say what they want to hear. At least, that seems to be the case with this election cycle.
FBI don't give a sh*t about politics so whether their actions are unintentionally favouring one side over another is not their problem ...
And yeah, you are right that people only want to hear the things they want but that's just human nature to be egotistical ...
Most conspiracies end up factual. They've brought groups like Bilderberg into the limelight. Produced footage of Bohemian Grove ( watch the video). I mean any ill informed idiot with a pea brained mind can at least gather up enough of a thought process to logically determine that the "official" 911 story is complete and utter nonsense. If that makes him crazy, so be it.
I'd rather listen to that than the talking points of several major corporations who own all the media outlets.
Regarding "Most conspiracies end up factual", I'll just say that they don't. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. But why wait until something becomes factual? Let's just call it confirmed right away.
And the list of crazy things Alex Jones claims to believe is rather long. One of my favorites is this one:
“The reason there are so many gay people now is because it’s a chemical warfare operation. I have the government documents where they said they’re going to encourage homosexuality with chemicals so people don’t have children.”
Yes, there are are horomone disrupting chemicals out there such as BPA that do in fact feminize men and cause the most damage during fetal stages. Given there is no evidence to substantiate a gay gene, homosexuality seems to be a chemical imbalance that does occur in the womb.
As for the video, I haven't been able to research for myself so I cannot comment. Jones isn't always accurrate but as I stated earlier, they are a hell of alot better than the three jokes of cable news networks I provided.
I mean...too be fair, people tend to listen to the FBI when they say what they want to hear. At least, that seems to be the case with this election cycle.
FBI don't give a sh*t about politics so whether their actions are unintentionally favouring one side over another is not their problem ...
And yeah, you are right that people only want to hear the things they want but that's just human nature to be egotistical ...
Yes. On this we agree. The FBI has important shit to do and they don't have time for the media circus that has become modern elections.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.
