There is nothing absurd about my comment Alex Jones is clinically insane and so are most people that work for Info Wars.  The Amoured Skeptic Youtube video that was posted here earlier pretty much proofs that there are a bunch of nuts working for Info Wars that guy they hired that was featured in that video couldn't even get a job as a janitor at a real news organization that is how insane that guy is.

He doesn't say soon. He just says the government is going to commit a major terrorist attack and blame it on "someone like Bin Laden" Who was easily the most famous terrorist in the world at the time, so if you're going to name a random terrorist leader, it's probably going to be him.

He also said that the government would use it to instill martial law, which never happened.

He stated AFTER several times that he predicted 9/11 by saying that Bin Laden would attack New York before the end of October, but that's just him trying to lend himself credibility.

Just because you eat up their bullshit doesn't mean that they are becoming mainstream most right wing media is actually less popular then it ever was.

What fucking planet are you on? Do a little googling. 

For two months Jones had the "expose the government as terrorists campaign" which he provided the whitehouse switchboard number for people to call into as he stated that there were going to use bin laden in a false flag. It wasn't as random as you're falsely attempting to make it sound.

He basically reiterated the same information as Bill Cooper, only Cooper provided a much more detailed segment.

Watch the whole show, not the 2 minute soundbyte. 

Sorry, I should have rephrased that as mainline conspiracy theories. Those that hold water, not the absurd David Icke ones regarding aliens,etc. Those that are meant to distract from valid theories. As for journalistic integrity,this election has painted a very clear picture on what the current mainstream pundits lack and have really shown true colours of biased.

Yup, Sweden who has had a massive influx of economic migrants pretending to be refuguees who do not even share the same cultural values as Sweden, had absolutely no effect on this. While the Swedish government has catered to these people, Infowars did not pull the story because they called "Bullshit" on the vague explanation of the Swedish Transport Association. Don't get me wrong, I do not believe that Infowars is perfect and that they  have flawless reporting. No news outlet does and any belief would be absolutely absurd. It is not suprising that Swedishg government officials and authorities have helped as an example coverup sexual assualts and rapes of female youth by migrant gangs in order to suit their agenda. As for your most serious news outlet comments, please research how many times Fox,CNN and MSNBC have made false statements and bothered to put out a proper retraction.

Yes, because countries (like Canada and later U.S) decided to ban BPA in plastic bottles over concerns of horomone disruption in youth.They just magically did this to make thmeselves feel better. They animals they test, the breed  of mouse that has similarities in studies which we use to determine certain standards in humans was finding that BPA was causing Estrogen mimicking hormones in men. It was published through Harvard as well, FFS!

As for the three news channels you mentioned, as someone pointed out earlier, there's a difference between bias and BS. CNN, Fox, etc, even if they are biased, they do still have some aspirations of journalistic integrity and responsibility. No news outlet that wants to be taken seriously would post headlines like "Clinton is confirmed to be a communist Chinese spy" without irrefutable evidence. And if there was any plausible cause for suspicion of this, it would be all over 

the news, just like FBI reopening the investigation on the emails is, in spite of them saying it may or may not even be related to her.

That someone was a moron/ well meaning idiot unfortunately. Journalistic integrity is a  figment of one's imagination when using either one of those three outlets as a reputable source. MSNBC and CNN have had headlines where stating Trump is a racist (not a fan of Trump but believe he is the lesser of two evils) when nothing he stated can be actaully classified as racism, if you actually listen to his speech. Wikileaks has revealed as well that these journalists with apparent integrity (some of them) not only picked sides but fed information to the  Clinton campaign prior to debates. 

I will admit the headline of "Chinese spy" was absurd. Influenced financially by China would have been more appropriate. It seems Infowars has been counterin mainstream media with similr tactics. Your statement is like someone living in a glass house throwing a stone however as there is no actual concrete evidence (which Clinton lied about on ntional t.v) linking the Russians to the wikileaks, however our media has deceptively portrayed this story to hold actual merit. 

http://www.attn.com/stories/10483/chart-compares-presidential-candidates-honesty

“Occult Hillary Summons The Dead”; Yes, that would be an accurate way to describe when one is attempting to communicate with the dead in a séance. It is an occult (hidden) practice. There are numerous sources from over the years detailing Hillary’s involvement in new age spiritualist practices. I’ll list one but can provide others http://gawker.com/remember-when-hillary-clinton-maybe-communed-with-dead-1775824084

The Jones quote saying  that” "Yeah, so, Sandy Hook is a synthetic completely fake with actors, in my view, manufactured. I couldn’t believe it at first. I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids. And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors. I mean they even ended up using photos of kids killed in mass shootings here in a fake mass shooting in Turkey -- so yeah, or Pakistan. The sky is now the limit."  I was not able to find a video where he stated that, as the media have not only taken him out of context but those like Mr. Maddow of MSNBC, have even gone to the point of lying about what he has said. An example being when she tried to link him to the “Reptillian” nonsense in a video by muting the sound, which in fact he was making fun of the people who had believed in that nonsense and was wearing a lizard mask.

Yup, they decide to finally enact a law that has been around for decades, magically I might add after the influx of refugees and economic migrants from Africa and the middle East. There were also two articles in relation to that matter that were posted on Infowars regarding the removal of the Christmas lights. http://www.infowars.com/sweden-bans-christmas-lights-under-the-guise-of-security/ and http://www.infowars.com/sweden-bans-christmas-street-lights-to-avoid-offending-muslim-migrants/ .

As you can see they provided one of the original articles that had covered the story and then Paul Joseph Watson included an opinion piece as to why he believed that this was in correlation with the influx of Muslim immigrants.

I mean, did you even read the actual article that was posted? Or did you just provide this nonsensical rant about bare minimum journalism and biased? I mean there is a lot of opinion in your lengthy response but not a lot of good context.

I found it highly amusing when you stated that people who listened to his show were easily impressionable. I would state it is the very opposite and that those who get their news sources from corporate controlled media would suite that description much better. People choose sites like Drudge and Infowars because mainstream media sources have become so discredited. Look at the way they constantly take Trump out of context. I’ve seen numerous headlines where it was stated that Trump said Mexican migrants were rapists when in fact he said illegal immigrants coming over the border, a fair majority were drug mules, criminals and rapists.

I have a hard time trusting a country that has politicians declaring that somehow it is worse when a native of the land commits sexual assault on women than when a migrant does it to create a distraction from the fact that the majority of rapes that occur in Sweden are in fact committed by these apparent refugees.

Stating that “the extreme right wants to paint so more situations like the KKK skinheads arming themselves at voting polls in the US to intimidate minorities from coming out to vote, can occur. Is just plain ignorant and stupid.” Those on what they call the rising alternative right are simply for freedom of speech. National sovereignty and maintaining the countries culture. You may want to educate yourself on this background instead of taking points from far-left news sites.

The Daily mail story is not really relevant to the discussion of Infowars being more credible than certain mainstream media websites so I do not have a comment for that

You assumed incorrectly. The cover-ups were in relation to Swedish authorities covering up sexual assaults being committed by migrant gangs (Stockholm music festival is an example). The did this over fears of worsening ethnic tensions, the success of the festival (which is absolutely no excuse) and as released in internal government memos that the incident would help the Swedish Democrats in the polls. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/13/sex-assaults-sweden-stockholm-music-festival

You must not have a clear understanding of what even goes on in your own country, let alone the world around you. You keep referring to my news sources and trying to paint them as far right extremism is laudable at best. Reality does not have a political bias but you can keep telling yourself that as you’ve clearly fallen for the whole left-right paradigm.

As for BPA, the studies show clear associations in humans. The types of mice that we use for every other study and drug testing due to their similarity in reactions as humans were proven to support this data. As for Jones stating that it was government plot, I haven’t seen the clip so I cannot comment as articles that linked this go to a source that is nonexistent.

I don’t know if you’ve been living in a hole in the ground but have you not heard of a thing called Wikileaks?Lol. Seriously, maybe you’re getting your news from some wackjob left wing news site (see, I can use ad-hominem as well but there are emails showing collaboration and deception in the media to where even CNN provides one of their pundits who happens to now be the DNC chairman questions prior to a debate. Articles where news outlets talk about squashing stories relating to Clinton and where numerous journalists agreed in private to promote positive stories about said candidate. The majority have not covered the Project Veritas video leaks where it showed those in close relation to the campaign admitting they commit voter fraud and staged and incited violence at Trump rallies. Seriously, do they report news in Sweden? You clearly have the internet so pleading ignorance is unacceptable. I never claimed Infowars to be perfect. I stated that they have become a more reputable source than those news outlets (CNN, Fox, MSNBC).  The BS meter weighs heavily on those outlets.

There is also a difference between making a racist and prejudice comment. Google is your friend. It wasn’t just the fact that the judge was Mexican but also his political activism in La Raza. They have continually promoted illegal immigration and put forth nonsensical ideas of Mexico taking back southern states and parts of California. If it’s racist to question a man’s integrity who is handling your case when he is involved in that manner, then I’d be a racist too. It would be like having a judge who is a nazi sympathizer be responsible for determining the outcome in a case pertaining to someone of Jewish decent.

“As for "the lesser of two evils", I'd say the same about the candidate who doesn't retween KKK leaders and is now officially endorsed by them, wants to remove all restrictions on mining, drilling and fracking, shut down the Environmental Protection Agency, and says they won't rule out nuking Europe. But that's another discussion.”

A woman who threatens and intimidates her husband’s sexual abuse victims, who praises an actual former KKK member Robert Byrd and is an apologist for him, a woman who praised Margaret sanger who referred to blacks as animals, a woman who stated that black youth livening in these impoverished neighborhoods who resort to crime are “Super Predators” who need to bend the heel and a woman who is basically threatening a war with Russia, which would result in nukes is far worse than the inaccurate description you gave of Trump. Seriously, nuking Europe? Where do you get your info from?

You’re just as bad as the media. A witch who summons demons? Common. There are Clinton insiders who over the years such as Larry Nichols who have stated that Hillary was into withcraft. This is the same person who spoke out about Bill’s infidelities in the early 90’s prior to it eventually coming to the limelight.

The 17 intelligent agencies was another Clinton exaggeration/lie. As reported in National review:

“Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies. And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks . . . are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow — the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europa and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”Saying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks. Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/441266/hillary-clinton-democratic-emails-hacked-russia

Your final summary was incorrect and flawed due to the errors that I have pointed out to you in my response. If you’re going to attempt to make a long-winded retort, please ensure that you have all your “facts” in order as your assumption about migrant gangs and Swedish law was inaccurate . You claim Infowars attempts to sway audience perception while completely ignoring the blatent tactics that the mainstream media have been doing, and you quote the biggest liar in politics (Clinton) who was immediately debunked after her 17 agencies comment. I’m not sure where you receive your “news” from but given the sheep like mentality,  I would suggest looking elsewhere.

I will address the Jones comment first. I 100% completely agree with the official story of 9/11 being a load of malarkey, this one I’m not sure and would have to spend time researching the claims. The U.S has staged false flags to push through political agendas (i.e Operation Gladio).

Source: http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article23781332.ab

"Inga lagar, regler eller förordningar har ändrats. Men ändå kan gatubilden i vinter se annorlunda ut än många väntar sig. Nu visar det sig nämligen att många mindre orter runt om i landet riskerar att bli utan juleljus.
Det är nämligen så att Trafikverket tagit över ägandet av många större vägar genom mindre samhällen. De förändrade ägarförhållandena innebär också att Trafikverket istället för kommunen äger elstolparna"

Quick google translate cause I'm lazy, and it's pretty accurate:

"No laws, rules or regulations have been changed. But nevertheless the street scene in winter look different than many expect. Now it turns namely that many smaller communities around the country risks being without Christmas lights.
The fact is that the Transport Administration has taken over the ownership of many major roads through small communities. The change in ownership also means that Trafikverket instead municipality owns the traffic poles"

Let me get this straight for a moment. You criticize Infowars as a news source, yet you have the audacity to use Aftonbladet? They are so far to left in lunacy that they make MSNBC look like a centered political station. Not to mention the anti-sematic rhetoric.

Oh, and if you want to talk about poor journalism and conspiracy reports, look no further than their absurd report that drew heavy criticism for complete and utter lack of journalism when they tried to claim Neo Nazis were attacking children, when in fact local news weeks later showed that the incident was police chasing away people handing out leaflets about unaccompanied migrant children and crime.

This report makes no mention whatsoever of “attacks” upon “young migrants.”

Issued on 01-30-2016 at 08:39, this official Stockholm police statement, titled “Summary text about the event in central Stockholm during Friday evening,” says only that:

On Friday evening, police received information that several people were planning to be in central Stockholm to reveal [with leaflets] the link between unaccompanied refugee children and crime.

These leaflets were handed out by black-clad people with headbands and armbands of an unknown color.

http://newobserveronline.com/stockholm-attack-invented-by-controlled-media/

You live in a country, where they have elected refugee or migrant.  representatives telling the general public that if a native of the country omits an act of sexual assault against a female, then somehow, that is actually worse than if it were to be committed by a refugee or migrant.

 You live in a country where government authorities and officials covered up sexual assault and rapes of women by migrant gangs because they were worried about a political party they disagree with gaining further prominence in the polls.

Regardless of whether it was mentioned, when you have a government that has gone out of its way to cover-up migrant sexual assaults due to a political agenda, then common sense dictates that you need to question its actions.

The excuse of  "Poles are not designed for the weight of Christmas lights, and we have to remove anything that should not be there," said Eilin Isaksson, national coordinator at the Swedish Transport Administration.” Does not hold much water and is absurd after decades of tradition.

This just happens to coincide in a country who is pandering to migrants where a massive influx has occurred. 

Sharu said: Scisca said: I'm just gonna say one thing to you. I'm from Poland. A country that's actually in real threat of being attacked by Russia at some point in the future. I think it's safe to say that we pretty much hate each other. Yet, the topic of Russia is nowhere near as big when our elections come. Accusations of being secretly working for Russia, secretly having a pro-Russian policy or something being forgered by Russians doesn't really happen here. Seriously, I can't think of a single case. I'm shocked and disgusted watching Clinton screaming "Russians" left and right. She'd be considered a joke and dismissed as detrimental even in a country that's as clearly anti-Russian as Poland. Seriously, think about it. It's hard for me to acknowledge this, but even I think she's paranoid about Russia and that it's pathetic to blame everything that happens on Russians. People who know my forum history of posts about Russia (some probably see me as the No. 1 Russophobe here ) should know, that such a comment coming from me means she's seriously gone overboard. Chill out Hillary, the Russians don't run everything that's happening in the US... ...it's the Jews!! Wow, my applauds! )))

Cherish the moment, my friend, for they don't come often